Abstract

To studied Bayesian aspect of small area estimation using Unit level model. In this paper we proposed and evaluated new prior distribution for the ratio of variance components in unit level model rather than uniform prior. To approximate the posterior moments of small area means, Laplace approximation method is applied. This choice of prior avoids the extreme skewness, usually present in the posterior distribution of variance components. This property leads to more accurate Laplace approximation. We apply the proposed model to the analysis of horticultural data and results from the model are compared with frequestist approach and with Bayesian model of uniform prior in terms of average relative bias, average squared relative bias and average absolute bias. The numerical results obtained highlighted the superiority of using the proposed prior over the uniform prior. Thus Bayes estimators (with new prior) of small area means have good frequentist properties such as MSE and ARB as compared to other traditional methods viz., Direct, Synthetic and Composite estimators.

Highlights

  • Model-based small area estimation methods have been widely used in practice due to the increasing demand for precise estimates for local regions and various small areas

  • In this paper we focus on Unit level models that are related to the unit level values of response through a nested error linear regression model, under the assumption that the nested error and the model error are independent of each other and normally distributed with common mean zero and common or different variances

  • We propose a new prior for the variance component and use laplace method to approximate the posterior moments involved in the hierarchical Bayesian (HB) approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Model-based small area estimation methods have been widely used in practice due to the increasing demand for precise estimates for local regions and various small areas. The nested error unit level regression model was first used to model county crop areas in USA (Battese et al, 1988), they have used the normally distributed common errors variance assumption and revealed that based on the fitting-of-constants method the estimates of errors variances are slightly different from each other. Techniques for validating their model on the basis of unit level auxiliary variables are considered.

Unit level model
EBLUP estimator of unit level model
Bayesian formulation of unit level model
Ni j si yij j si yij
Posterior moments of finite population mean when known
Numerical study
Comparison of different estimators
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.