Abstract

Event Abstract Back to Event Hidden Markov models for the stimulus-response relationships of multi-state neural systems Sean Escola1* and Liam Paninski2 1 Columbia University, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, United States 2 Columbia University, United States Recent experimental results suggest that neural networks are associated with multiple firing regimes, or states, such as tonic and burst modes in thalamus (for review, see Sherman, Trends in Neuroscience, 2001) and UP and DOWN states in cortex (e.g. Anderson et al., Nature Neuroscience, 2000). It is reasonable to speculate that neurons in multi-state networks that are involved in sensory processing might display differential firing behaviors in response to the same stimulus in each of the states of the system, and, indeed, Bezdudnaya et al. (Neuron, 2006) showed that temporal receptive field properties change between tonic and burst states for relay cells in rabbit thalamus. Motivated by these results, we previously presented a general framework for estimating state-dependent neural response properties from paired spike-train and stimulus data assuming that neuronal assemblies transition between several discrete hidden states (Escola and Paninski, Cosyne, 2007). We modified the traditional hidden Markov model (HMM) framework to permit point-process observables such as spike-trains, and, for maximal flexibility in our model, we allowed an external, time-varying stimulus, if present, and the neurons’ own spike histories to drive both the spiking behavior in each state and the transitioning behavior between states. We showed that an appropriately modified expectation-maximization algorithm could be constructed to learn the model parameters and gave preliminary results with simulated data. Although HMMs have been used previously to analyze neuronal data (e.g. Abeles et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1995; Chen et al., Neural Computation, 2009), our model is an extension to the stimulus and history-dependent regime. In this poster, we review this previous work and then apply our model to a recently published data set of known multi-state neuronal ensembles (Jones et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007). We show that inclusion of spike-history information significantly improves the fit of the model compared to the analysis given in Jones et al. We then show that a simple reformulation of the state-space of the HMM’s underlying Markov chain allows us to implement a hybrid half-multi-state/half-histogram model which captures more of the neuronal variability than either a simple HMM or a simple peri-stimulus time histogram (PSTH) model alone. This hybrid model learns firing-rate histograms that are triggered by the state-transition times rather than the trial start-times (i.e. these are state-dependent peri-transition time histograms or PTTHs as opposed to traditional PSTHs), and uncovers interesting and unexpected transition-locked dynamics in the data such as oscillations that are phase-locked to the transition times. We believe that techniques such as these may allow for the identification of data as multi-state that could not have been so identified by earlier methods, particularly data derived from neural systems where it is the network dynamics that are state-dependent rather than simple features such as firing rate, inter-spike interval distribution, or resting membrane potential. Conference: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 25 Feb - 2 Mar, 2010. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Poster session III Citation: Escola S and Paninski L (2010). Hidden Markov models for the stimulus-response relationships of multi-state neural systems. Front. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.03.00237 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 04 Mar 2010; Published Online: 04 Mar 2010. * Correspondence: Sean Escola, Columbia University, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, New York, United States, gse3@columbia.edu Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Sean Escola Liam Paninski Google Sean Escola Liam Paninski Google Scholar Sean Escola Liam Paninski PubMed Sean Escola Liam Paninski Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.

Highlights

  • Evidence from recent experiments indicates that many neural systems may exhibit multiple, distinct firing regimes, such as tonic and burst modes in thalamus, and UP and DOWN states in cortex (e.g. Anderson et al, 2000; Sanchez-Vives and McCormick, 2000; Haider et al, 2007)

  • It is reasonable to speculate that neurons in multi-state networks that are involved in sensory processing might display differential firing behaviors in response to the same stimulus in each of the states of the system, and, Bezdudnaya et al (2006) showed that temporal receptive field properties change between tonic and burst states for relay cells in rabbit thalamus

  • Our model is an extension of previous hidden Markov model (HMM) applied to neural data (e.g. Abeles et al, 1995; Seidemann et al, 1996; Jones et al, 2007; Chen et al, 2009; Tokdar et al, 2009), and is an alternative to several of the recently developed linear state-space models (e.g. Brown et al, 2001; Smith and Brown, 2003; Eden et al, 2004; Kulkarni and Paninski, 2007) which attempt to capture more of the complexity in the stimulus-response relationship than is possible with a simple GLM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evidence from recent experiments indicates that many neural systems may exhibit multiple, distinct firing regimes, such as tonic and burst modes in thalamus (for review, see Sherman, 2001), and UP and DOWN states in cortex (e.g. Anderson et al, 2000; Sanchez-Vives and McCormick, 2000; Haider et al, 2007). It is reasonable to speculate that neurons in multi-state networks that are involved in sensory processing might display differential firing behaviors in response to the same stimulus in each of the states of the system, and, Bezdudnaya et al (2006) showed that temporal receptive field properties change between tonic and burst states for relay cells in rabbit thalamus. These results call into question traditional models of stimulus-evoked neural responses which assume a fixed, reproducible mechanism by which a stimulus is translated into a spike-train. Our model is an extension of previous HMMs applied to neural data (e.g. Abeles et al, 1995; Seidemann et al, 1996; Jones et al, 2007; Chen et al, 2009; Tokdar et al, 2009), and is an alternative to several of the recently developed linear state-space models (e.g. Brown et al, 2001; Smith and Brown, 2003; Eden et al, 2004; Kulkarni and Paninski, 2007) which attempt to capture more of the complexity in the stimulus-response relationship than is possible with a simple GLM

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.