Abstract

As patients with abnormal baseline coagulation were excluded from the large randomized trials, the safety of intravenous thrombolysis after ischaemic stroke in this patient population remains controversial. We assessed the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) after systemic thrombolysis in patients with elevated baseline international normalized ratios (INRs) (≥1.3) or activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) (>37 s) using a prospectively recorded database from 2006 to 2010. An intracerebral hemorrhage leading to a deterioration of ≥4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke scale (NIHSS) was classified as symptomatic. Amongst 688 patients (mean age, 72 years; median NIHSS, 11, median onset-to-treatment time, 135 min), 36 patients (5%) had an abnormal baseline coagulation. Twenty-nine of these patients had taken oral anticoagulants leading to elevated baseline INRs (median INR: 1.5; IQR 1.4-1.9), whereas seven patients had elevated aPTTs because of heparin therapy (n = 2), a coagulation disorder (n = 2), or for unknown reasons (n = 3). The rate of SICH did not differ significantly between patients with abnormal and normal baseline coagulation (4.4% vs. 0%; P = 0.6). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between both treatment groups (8.3% in patients with abnormal baseline coagulation vs. 8.7% in patients with normal baseline coagulation, P = 1.0). The risk of SICH following intravenous thrombolysis after ischaemic stroke does not appear to be increased in patients with abnormal baseline coagulation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.