Abstract

Background: Helical tomotherapy is a new form of image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy that may improve local control and decrease radiation toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate if high-dose helical tomotherapy is tolerated by patients aged 75 years or older and if the side effects are comparable with those experienced by younger patients. Methods: Between January 2011 and August 2012, patients with prostate cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy without elective pelvic irradiation as definitive aim were reviewed and divided into two age groups: ≥75 years and <75 years. Acute genitourinary (GU) and lower gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities between the two groups were compared. Results: Twenty patients aged 75 years or older and 23 patients younger than 75 years were evaluated. Radiotherapy was administered to a total dose of 76−78 Gy in 38−39 fractions or 70 Gy in 28 fractions. There was no grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity and no grade 2 acute lower GI symptom, but the patients complained of grade 2 acute GU toxicity, 25.0% for the older group and 13.0% for the younger group. There was no significant difference in the rate of acute toxicity between the age groups. Hypofractionation showed a significant association with higher grade 2 acute GU toxicity (p=0.024) with the grade 2 acute GU toxicity having no significant correlation with T-stage, Gleason score, prostate specific antigen level, androgen deprivation therapy, and comorbidities. Conclusion: High-dose helical tomotherapy to the prostate without pelvic irradiation was well tolerated by elderly prostate cancer patients 75 years and older.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.