Abstract
At common law and in Nigeria, hearsay evidence arises where a witness in his own testimony makes a statement, oral or written made by another person who experienced, heard and saw an incident happen in order to establish the truth asserted. Such testimony is generally inadmissible because the informant who witnessed the event is not in court to prove the truth of his statement under oath. This paper examines what is hearsay evidence and further seeks to discuss exceptions to the rule and highlights reasons for its inadmissibility. The finding of this article is that hearsay evidence is weak and untrustworthy to be relied upon by the court, the same not being a testimony of a person who witnessed the event. The paper recommends that the Evidence Act be amended to provide for the range of offences that section 37 of Evidence Act can cover apart from exceptions mentioned in Sections 38-45.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
