Abstract

Abstract Introduction In recent years, parents have been playing an important role in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED), and wish to be present when invasive procedures (IP) are performed. Objectives (1) To compare the presence of parents during IP in PED in Spain between 2008 and 2012; (2) to compare the arguments to restrict the presence and problems arising from this; and (3) to determine whether the views of health personnel have changed on this subject. Methodology A descriptive multicenter comparative study was conducted in 2008 and 2012. A total of 42 questionnaires were sent by email to PED managers, with the responding hospitals being included in the 2 periods of the study. Results A total of 22 hospitals participated in the study. The presence of parents in the PED increased between 2008 and 2012 for all IP, significantly in the blood test and urine catheterization. In 2012, managers stated that children are not so nervous, anxiety of the parents, and fear of a poorer staff performance, as an argument to restrict family presence. There were few problems during the 2 periods, with the poor behaviour of the children decreasing. According to managers, the opinion of health personnel has not changed in the last four years. Conclusions The presence of parents during the IP in the PED has increased in the last four years, although the presence is low for more invasive procedures. Managers argue the presence of fewer behaviour problems to restrict family presence. The opinion of the staff has not changed in the last four years, although more studies are required on this issue.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.