Harnableitungsformen

Abstract

Standardized operating techniques and surgeons' experiences have contributed to the development of complex urinary diversion systems over the last two decades. Patients' desires and comorbidity risks, such as kidney or bowel dysfunction, as well as their mental and manual abilities need to be taken into account. Careful preoperative decision making is essential if patients are to accept the chosen urinary diversion system and improve their quality of life. Ileal and ileocecal orthotopic neobladders have proven to be effective and comfortable for long-time use, thus stimulating decisions for orthotopic bladder substitution despite the risk of incontinence episodes, especially during the night. Catheterization of continent reservoirs connected to the umbilicus (e.g., ileocecal reservoirs, Mainz pouch I) are widely accepted as an alternative diversion procedure if the urethra and/or sphincter region have to be removed. The patient's desire to avoid a wet stoma and achieve a cosmetically "unchanged" body image is met by these urinary diversion techniques. The surgeon's experience and the patient's mental and general health status must be considered in order to meet the increased complexity of these specific urinary diversions. Nevertheless, elderly patients often tend to prefer an ileal conduit as the easiest solution for urinary diversion. Therefore, even in experienced urological departments, the percentage of patients with orthotopic or self-catheterizable bladder substitution ranges between 30% and 66%, while the ileal conduit is selected in up to 64% of cases after cystectomy. The future of laparoscopic cystectomy has just begun and will affect future techniques of urinary diversion.