Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers at a tertiary maternity hospital in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study.

Hand Hygiene Behaviors Monitored by an Electronic System in the Intensive Care Unit

Hand hygiene (HH) compliance of healthcare workers (HCWs) remains suboptimal despite standard multimodal promotion, and evidence for the effectiveness of novel interventions is urgently needed. Aim: Improve HCWs’ HH compliance toward minimizing healthcare associated infection (HCAI) risk in Wadi Al Dawasir Hospital (WDH), central Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methodology: A quasi experimental approach was adopted to achieve study aim. The HCWs’ behavior of HH during the duration between 2015 and 2016 was evaluated before and after a HH educational plan based on the World Health Organization (WHO) “Multimodal HH Improvement Strategy” (MMHHIS). The HCWs’ compliance in response to HH indications represented by the WHO’s “My 5-Moments for HH” and the type of HH action taken, whether hand washing (HW) or hand-rubbing (HR) were analyzed. Results: The number of opportunities observed of HH performance accounted 230 in 2015 (pre-education), and 237 in 2016 (post-education). The HCWs’ HH compliance rate in the pre-education phase did not vary by the 5-moment indications [χ2(df 4) = 0.01, p=0.98]. Conversely, the compliance rate after HH education was higher than non-compliance across all 5-moment indication opportunities (ranged between 57.0% up –to 88.9%) [χ2(df 1) =18.25, p<0.001]. Only the 3rd – and 4th 5-moment indications (“after body fluid exposure” and “after patient contact,” respectively) were met with a significant HH improvement [χ2(df 1)= 8.98, p=0.003; and χ2(df 1)= 16.3, p<0.0001, respectively]. An overall improvement of HH compliance from 49.1% to 69.6% was significantly achieved as a result of submission to the selected HH educational plan (Z=-4.38, p=0.001). Only physicians and nurses showed a significant “within-profession” improvement in HH compliance after education, compared to that before education (Z=-3.51, p=0.001, Z=-2.48, p=0.013, respectively). Conclusions: Applying a HH education plan based on standardized multimodal HH strategy proved effective in improving the HH compliance of the hospital’s staff. An ongoing observation policy within a HH-resourceful environment assures a sustainable and sound HCWs’ HH behavior.

Hand hygiene (HH) plays a crucial role in mitigating healthcare-associated infections. Improving HH compliance in healthcare facilities in resource-limited settings is urgently needed. We implemented the World Health Organization (WHO) HH improvement strategy using a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach targeting improvement in HH compliance by healthcare workers (HCWs). An intervention was implemented in six hospitals using a longitudinal study design between May 2019 and April 2023. We set up and monitored infection prevention and control (IPC) and HH programs using WHO's infection prevention and control assessment framework at the facility level (IPCAF) and hand hygiene self-assessment framework (HHSAF) tools. We implemented HH interventions using CQI techniques while targeting HCW HH knowledge and compliance with the WHO's Five Moments of HH. By the end of the intervention, IPC and HH capacity improved in all six hospitals, from a median score of 547.0 and 252.5 on IPCAF and HHSAF tools at baseline to an advanced score of 635.0 and 350.0 at endline assessment, respectively. Similarly, HCWs' HH knowledge improved in all hospitals, from a mean score of 45.0% at baseline to 76.0% at endline assessment, most notably among nurses. HH compliance, as assessed using WHO's HH observation tool, at least doubled in all hospitals, rising from 19.9% to 53.8%, with before touching a patient registering the highest (22-fold) improvement. On linear regression analysis, no significant association was observed between HH compliance and IPCAF b = -0.0004 (95% CI -0.093, 0.93) p = 0.990, HHSAF b = 0.009 (95% CI -.0127, 0.145) p = 0.842 and HCW knowledge on HH/IPC b = -0.165 (95% CI 0.815, 0.485) p = 0.519. This is the first documented comprehensive utilization of CQI approaches to implement HH as an entry point for the development of hospital IPC programs, and evaluation of WHO tools and approaches for IPC and HH improvement in Uganda. Implementation of the WHO HH improvement strategy using a CQI approach can lead to remarkable improvement in HH capacity, and HCW compliance and knowledge in hospitals within resource-limited settings.

Background: Hand hygiene (HH) compliance of healthcare workers (HCWs) remains suboptimal despite standard multimodal promotion, and evidence for the effectiveness of novel interventions is urgently needed. Aim: Improve HCWs’ HH compliance toward minimizing healthcare associated infection (HCAI) risk in Wadi Al Dawasir Hospital (WDH), central Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methodology: A quasi experimental approach was adopted to achieve study aim. The HCWs’ behavior of HH during the duration between 2015 and 2016 was evaluated before and after a HH educational plan based on the World Health Organization (WHO) “Multimodal HH Improvement Strategy” (MMHHIS). The HCWs’ compliance in response to HH indications represented by the WHO’s “My 5-Moments for HH” and the type of HH action taken, whether hand washing (HW) or hand-rubbing (HR) were analyzed. Results: The number of opportunities observed of HH performance accounted 230 in 2015 (pre-education), and 237 in 2016 (post-education). The HCWs’ HH compliance rate in the pre-education phase did not vary by the 5-moment indications [χ2(df 4) = 0.01, p = 0.98]. Conversely, the compliance rate after HH education was higher than non-compliance across all 5-moment indication opportunities (ranged between 57.0% up to 88.9%) [χ2(df 1) = 18.25, p < 0.001]. Only the 3rd and 4th 5-moment indications (“after body fluid exposure” and “after patient contact,” respectively) were met with a significant HH improvement [χ2(df 1) = 8.98, p = 0.003; and χ2(df 1) = 16.3, p < 0.0001, respectively]. An overall improvement of HH compliance from 49.1% to 69.6% was significantly achieved as a result of submission to the selected HH educational plan (Z = −4.38, p = 0.001). Only physicians and nurses showed a significant “within-profession” improvement in HH compliance after education, compared to that before education (Z = −3.51, p = 0.001, Z = −2.48, p = 0.013, respectively). Conclusions: Applying a HH education plan based on standardized multimodal HH strategy proved effective in improving the HH compliance of the hospital’s staff. An ongoing observation policy within a HH-resourceful environment assures a sustainable and sound HCWs’ HH behavior.

Is it possible to achieve 100 percent hand hygiene compliance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic?

Background: Health care-associated infection (HCAI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalised patients, particularly neonates. Compliance with hand hygiene (HH) recommendations is the simplest and most effective measure in preventing this infection. Objectives: To determine the HH practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the newborn unit of a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya, their knowledge and perceptions regarding HCAI and importance of HH, and barriers to the recommended HH practices. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the HCWs’ compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) ‘5 Moments for Hand Hygiene’ and a structured self-administered questionnaire adopted from the WHO knowledge and perception of HCW questionnaires was used to answer the secondary objectives. Results: The overall HH compliance rate was 15%. HCWs were twice more likely to take a HH action ‘after’ than ‘before’ a patient care procedure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–4.19; P = 0.03). Nurses and nursing students had statistically significant lower compliance (OR 0.41; 95% CI = 0.18-0.91; p=0.016) and (OR 0.21; 95% CI = 0.06-0.70; p = 0.004) respectively, compared to the doctors. More than half (52%) of the HCWs were unaware of the five moments/indication for HH. Lack of supplies, forgetfulness and use of gloves were the commonly cited barriers to HH compliance. Discussion: HH compliance rate among HCWs in the newborn unit of the tertiary referral hospital was very low. The observed and reported barriers to optimal HH compliance demonstrate a necessity for the adoption of the WHO recommended multimodal HH improvement strategy in this unit.

The impact of the hand hygiene role model project on improving healthcare workers’ compliance: A quasi-experimental observational study

Objectives: To propose the improvements measures by analysing the influencing factors of hand hygiene (HH) compliance by observing the behaviour of health care workers (HCWs). Method: The observational study was conducted at a public tertiary hospital in Zhejiang, China, from September 2018 to March 2021. A total of 58 HH observers were trained to conduct a direct observation on the HH behaviors of personnel in the hospital amongst the health care workers. We have observed over 9000 hand hygiene opportunities. The collected data were classified according to time factors, department parameters, and profession conduct of the observed. Hand hygiene (HH) compliance rates were calculated for each category, and a chi-square test was used to analyze differences of the HH compliance rates. Furthermore, binary logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis in each of the hand hygiene moments. Results: The HH compliance rates of HCWs were statistically different before and after the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in the morning and the afternoon, this was observed per parameters stated into objectives on weekdays vs non weekdays. And we found that HH compliance rates drop off a cliff from weekdays to non-weekdays. Conclusions: COVID-19, departments, professions, and weekdays were all factors that influence HH compliance amongst HCWs. However, the influencing factors were not all present in every HH behavior, and had different intensities of influence on HH compliance amongst the HCWs. These findings provide some reference for us to propose improvement measures.

The aim of the study was to report the results of a multimodal strategy for improvement of hand hygiene (HH) compliance in a third-level hospital in Mexico. This is an epidemiological study in a public, acute care, academic, tertiary referral center from 2009 to 2019. Healthcare worker (HCW) compliance with HH was assessed after implementation of the World Health Organization multimodal strategy that included permanent and widespread access to alcohol-based hand rubs; educational activities for staff, students, patients, and relatives; reminders in healthcare areas; patient empowerment; water quality surveillance; frequent evaluation of compliance; and feedback. The primary outcome was HH compliance rate (measured by direct observation). The association of HH with healthcare-associated infections was the secondary outcome. A total of 60,685 HH opportunities were evaluated. The HH compliance rate increased significantly from 39.83% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.83%-40.84%) to 64.81% (95% CI = 64.08%-65.54%), mostly due to HH compliance in World Health Organization moments 3 to 5 (r = 0.86, P = 0.001). A statistically significant inverse association was found between HH compliance rates and surgical site infection rates (incidence rate ratio = 0.9977, 95% CI = 0.9957-0.9997, P = 0.029). A multimodal strategy in a Latin American setting showed an increase in HH compliance over 10 years of follow-up that should nonetheless be improved. An association between HH compliance and surgical site infection rates was noticed, but this did not occur with other healthcare-associated infections; this underscores the need for a comprehensive bundled approach in their prevention.

Clean Hands, Safe Care: Role of hand hygiene training interventions in improving knowledge and Hand hygiene compliance rate among healthcare workers

Background: We sought to determine the minimum number of observations needed to determine hand hygiene (HH) compliance among healthcare workers. Methods: The study was conducted at a referral hospital. We retrospectively analyzed the result of HH monitoring from January to December 2018. HH compliance was calculated by dividing the number of observed HH actions by the total number of opportunities. Appropriate HH compliance rates were calculated based on the 6-step technique, modified from the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation. The minimum number of required observations (n) was calculated by the following equation using overall mean value (r), absolute precision (d), and confidence interval (1-α) [The equation: n3 Zα/22×ρ×1-ρ/d2]. We considered ds of 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30%, with CIs of 99%, 95%, and 90%, respectively. Among the various cases, we focused on 10% for d and 95% for CI. Results: During the study period, 8,791 opportunities among 1,168 healthcare workers were monitored. The mean HH compliance and appropriate HH compliance rates were 80.3% and 59.7%, respectively (Table 1). The minimum number of observations required to determine HH compliance rates ranged from 2 (d, 30%; CI, 90%) to 624 (d, 5%; CI, 99%), and the minimum number of observations for optimal HH compliance ranged from 5 (d, 30%, CI, 90%) to 642 (d, 5%; CI, 99%) (Figure 1). At 10% absolute precision with 95% confidence, the minimum number of observations to determine HH and optimal HH compliance were 61 and 92, respectively. Conclusions: The minimum number of observations to determine HH compliance varies widely according to setting, but at least 5 were needed to determine optimal HH compliance.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Background: The 10th outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has been ongoing since August 2018. It is the largestever outbreak reported in the country and the world's second largest in history. It has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 17 July 2019. The outbreak is ongoing in a densely-populated region, which is also experiencing a long-lasting humanitarian and security crisis. The affected region is characterised by insufficient prevention control practices in many health facilities and persistent reluctance in the community to accept response activities. Infection Prevention and Control and Hand Hygiene programmes were implemented in 10 hospitals to contribute in EVD containment and improving patient and healthcare personnel safety. The study aimed to evaluate whether the implementation of infection prevention and control programme in healthcare facilities improves the level of EVD preparedness and response. Methods: This quasi-experimental intervention study was conducted in ten hospitals of Goma EVD sub coordination, north Kivu Province between April and October 2019. Infection Prevention and Control and Hand Hygiene programmes were implemented in 10 hospitals in North-Kivu province in DRC. The main activities were: baseline and impact assessments of IPC and hand hygiene programmes, baseline and impact assessments of hand hygiene practices (direct observation) for frontline healthcare workers, setting up hospital IPC committee and nomination of hospital IPC focal point, briefing of the IPC committee members and IPC focal point on their roles and responsibilities, a 5 day IPC training workshop for hospital senior managers, IPC committee members and IPC focal point. Data was analysed using Ms Excel. Results: IPC programme baseline assessment demonstrated that 80% (8/10) of hospitals were at inadequate level, 20% (2/10) of hospitals were at basic level. Regarding hand hygiene programme, 80% (8/10) of hospitals were at inadequate level and 20% (2/10) of hospitals were at basic level. The findings from Hand hygiene practice baseline were: overall hand hygiene compliance was 33.1% (898/2713). All the 10 hospitals improved their hospital IPC level from inadequate level (8 hospitals) and basic level (2 hospitals) to intermediate level. Regarding hand hygiene programme, there were 4 hospitals that achieved advanced level, 5 hospitals achieved intermediate level and one hospital achieved basic level. During post-intervention assessment, hand hygiene practices among healthcare professionals improved significantly, whereby overall hand hygiene compliance improved from 33.1 (898/2713) to 70.5% (4368/6197). Conclusion: The best way to combat outbreaks including EVD in any country of the world is to strengthen its health systems with focus on Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) programme. Implementation of IPC and hand hygiene programmes in healthcare facilities in North-Kivu Province in DRC helped was a key in defeating EVD outbreak in Goma and it proved how important is to invest on health systems strengthening and IPC programme. IPC and Hand hygiene programmes should be integrated into preservice training for all health professionals. Communities should be engaged in IPC and hand hygiene programmes to ensure sustainability and ownship.

While improvement of hand hygiene (HH) compliance is considered as the best approach to reduce healthcare-associated infections, the instructional interventions in HH among healthcare workers of intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital was not successful enough. The following study was conducted to evaluate HH knowledge, perception, practice and effectiveness of the trainings among healthcare workers of ICU in our hospital. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU containing 8 medical and 16 surgical beds with 284 filled questionnaires about HH knowledge and 1187 observed opportunities for HH compliance. Overall observed HH compliance rate was 40.6%; lowest compliance was 21.7% for "before clean/aseptic procedure" indication and highest compliance was 68.6% for "after touching a patient" indication. Although > 90% healthcare workers correctly identified the World Health Organization's five indications for HH, 82 - 85% failed to recognize non-indications, i.e. when it was not necessary to perform HH. Our study showed that 15.1% of healthcare workers neither received nor felt the need for HH training. Despite regular HH trainings, healthcare workers could not differentiate when HH was not required which suggested failure to understand HH rationale. This may explain poor HH compliance rates. A systematic study is needed in order to find out the reasons behind of this noncompliance and improve HH training methods for educating healthcare workers.

Innovative technologies for hand hygiene monitoring are urgently needed in the fight against COVID-19

Improving hand hygiene compliance with comprehensive interventions over time