Abstract
Research into the practice of academics serves to inform higher education development (HED) theory and interventions, and is important for the development of the professional knowledge of the HED practitioner. Through such research HED practitioners gain access to what in another context is referred to as 'guilty knowledge'. The complex ethical and methodological challenges faced by HED researchers 'researching in their own backyard' may often be underestimated or overlooked in research proposals and practice. I propose that Heidegger's conceptualisation of aporia may extend our awareness beyond ethical customs and procedures to the underlying ontological nature of research ethics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
