Abstract

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article ArticleNo AccessGuidelines for Psychiatric Evaluation of Social Security Disability ClaimantsPublished Online:1 Apr 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.34.11.1044AboutSectionsView articleAbstractPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View articleAbstractThe Social Security Disability insurance (SSDI) program, which pays benefits to those too disabled to continue working, has been under serious scrutiny during the past year by Congress, the executive branch, the media, and concerned organizations such as the American Psychiatric Association. APA has fostered changes in the program that are nowpending in Congress and in the Social Security Administration-changes that will work to the benefit of individuals with severe mental impairments.Concern about the program has arisen from the changed adjudicative climate within which it operates-stressing terminations and denials over continuances and allowances-and the all-too-hurried manner in which disability adjudication has taken place in the past year. Current interpretation of the law and regulations further exacerbates the problems.These issues are being addressed by APA through legislation and regulations, but there are also other concerns. Of special importance is the adequacy of the medical records provided to disability determination officers for the adjudication of claims for the mentally impaired. Simply stated, improved psychiatric case records provided by psychiatrists, other physicians, and nonphysician mental health professionals can help ensure that proper disability determination decisions can be made.This document can help. By using the information it presents, clinicians can prepare medical information and histories for their mentally impaired patients that will help assure that such patients do not risk inappropriate denial ofSSDI benefits.The nature of the SSDI program dictates the need for certain case-building information that might not appear to be part of a usual medical record. Its requisites for detail are substantially dsfferent from and more demanding than those imposed by third-party insurers.The goal of tbis document is to assure that clinicians are providing the best medical evidence to the Social Security Administration about their patients, and that they are able to act as advocates for their patients by being informed not only about the medical implications of disability, but also about the disability determination process. Access content To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access. Personal login Institutional Login Sign in via OpenAthens Purchase Save for later Item saved, go to cart PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services $35.00 Add to cart PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services Checkout Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability. Not a subscriber? Subscribe Now / Learn More PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development. Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.). FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited bySocial Security Disability and the Mentally Ill: Changes in the Adjudication Process and Treating Source Information RequirementsPsychiatric Annals, Vol. 32, No. 5 Volume 34Issue 11 November 1983Pages 1044-1051 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 April 2006 Published in print 1 November 1983

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.