Guideline adherence and clinical outcome in vulnerable and healthy breast cancer patients: Results of a prospective cross-sectional study in Germany.

Abstract

e18132 Background: In 2003 the German Cancer Society and the German Society for Breast Disease introduced a number of Quality Indicators (QIs) to improve standards of breast cancer care. Although QIs should be based on clinical evidence, evidence for important subpopulations (i.e. vulnerable patients) is often limited. In this prospective cross-sectional study we assessed conformity and non-conformity of guidelines and their impact on clinical outcome in a real-world setting. Methods: This prospective analysis included patients with primary breast cancer. Patients with stage IV and recurrent breast cancer were excluded. Data was collected from 2012-2016 in six certified breast care centers using a personal questionnaire and data from the patients' medical records. Guideline adherence to a set of 11 QIs was explored. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were correlated with fulfillment of QIs and tumor characteristics. Results: Survival analysis was conducted in 2390 patients with a median follow-up of 16 months. 88 (4%) patients had a recurrent disease. 31 (1.3%) patients died of breast cancer. Tumor stage, grading, Her2- and hormone receptor status and Ki-67 correlated with DFS and OS. 1725/1907 patients (90.5%) received a guideline adherent treatment. The most prevalent reasons for non-conformity were old age (24.7%) and/or comorbidity (20.9%). Breast cancer specific DFS and OS were not significantly different between patients treated adherent or not adherent to the guidelines. In contrast, survival analysis of death other than breast cancer showed a significantly worse OS (p = 0.006) for patients not treated according to guideline recommendation. Conclusions: Conformity of clinical guidelines was observed in the majority of patients including healthy and vulnerable patients. These patients tended to have a longer breast cancer specific survival. Patients who were not considered suitable for guideline-adherent therapy died more often from other medical reasons rather than from breast cancer. In our study 10% of the patients had a limited life expectancy due to old age and co-morbidities with no assumed benefit from guideline adherence.