Abstract
This study used primary data, collected as part of the Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) project to compare net returns and cost efficiency between farmers who are beneficiaries of the project to farmers who are not beneficiaries. Additionally, non-beneficiary farmers who use the promoted technologies from the project are compared to other non-beneficiary farmers who do not use the promoted technologies. Propensity score matching is used to account for selection bias when comparing the outcomes of beneficiary and control groups. Results indicate higher return for project recipients as well as farmers who use the CSISA promoted resource-conserving technologies (RCTs).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
