Growth plate continuity on knee MRI predicts growth hormone effect in mid-to-late puberty with idiopathic short stature.

Background: Childhood growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) are endocrine disorders characterized by impaired linear growth due to insufficient or ineffective growth hormone (GH) activity. While daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy effectively restores growth, treatment adherence remains suboptimal owing to the burden of daily injections. Long-acting formulations such as pegylated recombinant human GH (PEG-rhGH) have been developed to improve convenience and compliance while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of once-weekly PEG-rhGH versus daily rhGH and to assess dose-response outcomes between higher- and lower-dose PEG-rhGH regimens in pediatric GHD and ISS. Methods: This study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to September 2025 using MeSH terms and free-text keywords for "PEGylated recombinant human growth hormone," "long-acting growth hormone," and "growth hormone deficiency." Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating PEG-rhGH in children (≤18 years) with GHD or ISS, comparing either once-weekly PEG-rhGH with daily rhGH or different PEG-rhGH doses. Data extraction included study design, participant characteristics, intervention details, and key outcomes (height SDS, height velocity, IGF-1 SDS). Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager with a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Results: Eight studies, comprising 2549 children, met the inclusion criteria. Once-weekly PEG-rhGH demonstrated comparable short-term growth outcomes to daily rhGH at 6 and 12 months, with modest but significant superiority in height SDS (MD = 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.19) and height velocity (MD = 0.74 cm/year, 95% CI 0.42-1.05) by 24 months. IGF-1 SDS did not differ significantly at 6 or 12 months. In dose comparisons, 0.2 mg/kg/week PEG-rhGH produced substantially greater gains in height SDS and IGF-1 SDS than 0.1 mg/kg/week, with a time-dependent increase in the magnitude of the effect. Safety analyses revealed no increase in adverse or serious adverse events with PEG-rhGH compared to daily rhGH; reactions were generally mild and transient. Conclusions: Once-weekly PEG-rhGH is as effective as daily rhGH for promoting growth in pediatric GHD and ISS, with possible long-term advantages in growth outcomes and similar safety. The higher PEG-rhGH dose (0.2 mg/kg/week) appears to optimize efficacy without compromising tolerability. Weekly administration may enhance adherence and quality of life, supporting PEG-rhGH as a viable alternative to daily GH therapy.

Some idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients may have varying degrees of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGFI) deficiency. Others with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) (peak GH<7ng/dL after provocation) have normal IGFI levels. Do children with ISS or those with GHD with variable pretreatment IGFI standard deviation score (IGFISDS) have different IGFI and growth responses to recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy? We studied the effect of GH therapy (0.035-0.06mg/kg/day) on linear growth and weight gain per day (WGPD) in children with ISS (n=13) and those with GHD (n=10) who have low pretreatment IGFISDS (IGF SDS<-1.5) and compared them with age-matched prepubertal children with ISS (n=10) and GHD (n=17) who had normal pretreatment IGFISDS. An untreated group of children with ISS (n=12) served as a control group. At presentation, the height standard deviation score (HtSDS) of children with ISS who had low pretreatment IGFISDS was significantly lower compared to the normal IGFI group. The age, body mass index (BMI), BMISDS, peak GH response to clonidine provocation and bone age did not differ between the two study groups. After 1year of treatment with rhGH (0.035-0.06mg/kg/day) IGFISDS increased significantly in both groups (p<0.05). Both had significantly increased HtSDS (catch-up growth). The increase in the HtSDS and WGPD were significantly greater in the lower pretreatment IGFISDS group. The IGFSDS, BMISDS, HtSDS and difference between HtSDS and mid-parental HtSDS were significantly greater in the rhGH treated groups vs. the not treated group. In the GHD groups (normal and low IGFISDS), after 1year of GH therapy (0.03-0.05mg/kg/day), the HtSDS increased significantly in both, (p<0.01). The WGPD and increment in BMI were significantly greater in children who had low pretreatment IGFISDS. There was a significant increase in the IGFSDS in the two treated groups (p<0.05), however, the WGPD was greater in the pretreatment low IGFISDS. IGFI deficiency represents a low anabolic state. Correction of IGFI level (through rhGH and/or improved nutrition) in short children (ISS and GHD) was associated with increased linear growth and WGPD denoting significant effect on bone growth and muscle protein accretion.

ObjectiveThis study analyzed metabolic indicators and height gain in short-statured children within the first year of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy, identifying predictive factors for treatment efficacy.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 72 children with short stature (growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature) receiving rhGH therapy (January 2022 to January 2024) was performed. Data included height, weight, age, skeletal age (SA), and laboratory results (IGF1, fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, thyroid function, lipids). Analyses focused on height standard deviation score (HSDS), HSDS for SA, and factors associated with 12-month changes in HSDS for SA (△HSDS for SA).ResultsThe mean initial rhGH dose was 0.053 ± 0.010mg/kg/day, with a mean starting age of 8.36 ± 2.24 years. Significant increases in HSDS and HSDS for SA were observed after 12 months. △HSDS for SA negatively correlated with baseline homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and fasting insulin, and positively correlated with baseline free triiodothyronine (FT3). Children with △HSDS for SA>0.5 had lower baseline insulin and HOMA-IR, and higher FT3, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and hemoglobin.ConclusionsInsulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, FT3, and HDL determine rhGH efficacy in short-statured children. Metabolic profiling optimizes rhGH therapy, and targeting insulin resistance may improve growth outcomes.

Objective:To explore the significance of recombinant human growth hormone(rhGH) therapy in promoting the growth and development of children with idiopathic short stature (ISS).Methods:Medical records of 95 children with ISS, treated in our hospital from July 2019 to July 2020, were retrospectively selected and divided into two groups based on the received treatment. Of them, 41 patients received routine treatment (Group-I) and 54 patients received a combination of routine and rhGH treatment (Group-II). The levels of serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), bone age, growth velocity, height standard deviation score (Ht-SDS), and adverse reactions were compared and analyzed between the two groups.Results:After treatment, IGF-1, bone age, growth velocity, and Ht-SDS in Group-II were higher than those in Group-I (P < 0.05); After treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions in Group-II was 7.41%, which had no significant difference compared with 7.32% in Group-I (P > 0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of children with Idiopathic Short Stature (ISS), the choice of rhGH can further improve the curative effect, promote the growth and development of children, without significant adverse reactions.

ObjectiveThis Italian survey aims to evaluate real-life long-term efficacy and safety of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy in children with short stature homeobox-containing gene deficiency disorders (SHOX-D) and to identify potential predictive factors influencing response to rhGH therapy.Design and methodsThis is a national retrospective observational study collecting anamnestic, anthropometric, clinical, instrumental and therapeutic data in children and adolescents with a genetic confirmation of SHOX-D treated on rhGH. Data were collected at the beginning of rhGH therapy (T0), yearly during the first 4 years of rhGH therapy (T1, T2, T3 and T4) and at near-final height (nFH) (T5), when available.ResultsOne hundred and seventeen SHOX-D children started rhGH therapy (initial dose 0.23 ± 0.04 mg/kg/week) at a mean age of 8.67 ± 3.33 years (74% prepubertal), 99 completed the first year of treatment and 46 reached nFH. During rhGH therapy, growth velocity (GV), standard deviation score (SDS) and height (H) SDS improved significantly. Mean H SDS gain from T0 was +1.14 ± 0.58 at T4 and +0.80 ± 0.98 at T5. Both patients carrying mutations involving intragenic SHOX region (group A) and ones with regulatory region defects (group B) experienced a similar beneficial therapeutic effect. The multiple regression analysis identified the age at the start of rhGH treatment (β = −0.31, P = 0.030) and the GV during the first year of rhGH treatment (β = 0.45, P = 0.008) as main independent predictor factors of height gain. During rhGH therapy, no adverse event of concern was reported.ConclusionsOur data confirm the efficacy and safety of rhGH therapy in SHOX-D children, regardless the wide variety of genotype.Significance StatementAmong children with idiopathic short stature, the prevalence of SHOX-D is near to 1/1000–2000 (1.1–15%) with a wide phenotypic spectrum. Current guidelines support rhGH therapy in SHOX-D children, but long-term data are still few. Our real-life data confirm the efficacy and safety of rhGH therapy in SHOX-D children, regardless of the wide variety of genotypes. Moreover, rhGH therapy seems to blunt the SHOX-D phenotype. The response to rhGH in the first year of treatment and the age when rhGH was started significantly impact the height gain.

This study was undertaken to identify growth hormone (GH) responsive proteins and protein expression patterns by short-term recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy in patients with idiopathic short stature (ISS) using proteomic analysis. Seventeen children (14 males and three females) with ISS were included. They were treated with rhGH at a dose of 0.31 ± 0.078 mg/kg/week for 3 months. Immunodepletion of six highly-abundant serum proteins followed by 2D DIGE analysis, and subsequent MALDI TOF MS, were employed to generate a panel of proteins differentially expressed after short-term rhGH therapy and verify the differences in serum levels of specific proteins by rhGH therapy. Fourteen spots were differentially expressed after rhGH treatment. Among them, apo E and apo L-1 expression were consistently enhanced, whereas serum amyloid A was reduced after rhGH therapy. The differential expressions of these proteins were subsequently verified by Western blot analysis using sera of the before and after rhGH treatment. This study suggests that rhGH therapy influences lipoprotein metabolism and enhances apo L-1 protein expression in ISS patients.

Objective To discuss the influence of high-dose recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy on serum vitamin D and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels in school-age children with idiopathic short stature (ISS). Method A total of 103 school-age children with ISS were selected from June 2016 to June 2020 in our hospital. The enrolled cases were divided into the low-dose group (n = 59) and high-dose group (n = 44) according to the treatment dose of rhGH. After the treatment, the height (Ht), height standard deviation score (Ht SDS), growth velocity (GV), and other indicators were recorded. The serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25-(OH)D] and IGF-1 levels of the two groups were tested, and the occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded. Results After treatment, the high-dose group outperformed the low-dose group in various growth effect indicators such as Ht, Ht SDS, and GV (P < 0.05). After treatment, the serum 25-(OH)D of children with ISS in the two groups increased significantly, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the serum IGF-1 of children with ISS in the two groups increased significantly, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). For children with ISS, adverse reactions induced by rhGH therapy were very rare. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions induced by different doses of rhGH in the treatment of ISS (P > 0.05). Conclusion rhGH has definite efficacy in the treatment of ISS children, for it can significantly increase the annual growth rate of ISS children in a dose-dependent manner. High-dose rhGH for ISS has a better therapeutic effect. At the same time, regardless of the dose level of rhGH, serum 25-(OH)D and IGF-1 levels in children with ISS were increased, with less adverse reactions and higher safety.

BackgroundA primary goal of recombinant human growth hormone therapy (GHT) in children is attaining normal adult height. In this study, children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) (including isolated idiopathic growth hormone deficiency [IGHD] and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency [MPHD]), idiopathic short stature (ISS), and Turner syndrome (TS) were evaluated for near-adult height (NAH) and percent achieving NAH within the normal range after approximately 4 years of GHT.MethodsData from the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program were analyzed for NAH from age at treatment start (ATS) (i.e., referral age as defined by age at enrollment in the study) to last clinic visit using one of the following two criteria: 1) age ≥18 years, or 2) if male: ≥16 years and height velocity (HV) <2 cm/year; if female: ≥15 years and HV <2 cm/year. All patients had a baseline height standard deviation score (HSDS) ≤ -2, and either GHD (n = 201), ISS (n = 19), or TS (n = 41). The main outcome measures included HSDS and corrected HSDS (HSDS-target HSDS) in response to GH treatment, and correlation of ATS with NAH HSDS.ResultsMean (± SD) chronological and bone ages at baseline were 14.0 ± 2.1 years and 11.7 ± 2.0 years, respectively, and mean GHT duration was 4.0 ± 1.6 years. Mean HSDS (baseline to NAH; GHD: -2.7 to -1.0; ISS: -2.8 to -1.4; TS: -3.0 to -1.8) and mean corrected HSDS (baseline to NAH; GHD: -2.1 to -0.3; ISS: -2.1 to -0.6; TS: -1.8 to -0.6) increased across diagnostic indications. Percentages of patients reaching near-adult HSDS > -2 were GHD: 87.6%; ISS: 78.9%; TS: 65.8%. Significant negative correlations were found between ATS and NAH HSDS when analyzed by sex.ConclusionsDespite a relatively advanced childhood age, the majority of GH-treated patients attained mean near-adult HSDS within the normal range (HSDS > -2). Negative correlations of ATS with near-adult HSDS indicate that an earlier age at treatment start would likely have resulted in greater adult height achieved in both male and female patients.

The aim of the studywas to investigate the coincidence of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and celiac disease (CD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients referred for short stature, and to evaluate the baseline anthropometric parameters and the effectiveness of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy in the first year in those patients (GHD+CD/IBD subgroup) in comparison to patients with GHD without CD or IBD (GHD-CD/IBD subgroup).Material and methodsThe study was retrospective and included 2196 short patients (height SDS [Standard Deviation Score] ≤ –1.2). 1454 patients had height SDS ≤ –2. Twenty-nine patients suffered from CD or IBD. GHD was confirmed in 419 patients with height SDS ≤ –2. The coexistence of GHD and CD or IBD was found in seven patients (GHD+CD/IBD subgroup).ResultsAt baseline the GHD-CD/IBD subgroup did not differ significantly in chronological age, height SDS, height velocity (HV) before rhGH therapy, body weight SDS, and body mass index SDS from the GHD+CD/IBD subgroup. The improvement in height SDS within the first year of rhGH therapy was higher in the GHD+CD/IBD subgroup than in the GHD-CD/IBD subgroup and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). HV in the first year of rhGH therapy was also significantly higher in the GHD+CD/IBD subgroup than in the GHD-CD/IBD subgroup (p < 0.05).ConclusionsIn patients with chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, especially celiac disease, coexisting with GHD, rhGH therapy could be effective and should be administered together with therapy of primary gastrointestinal disease.

&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Introduction&lt;/st&gt; Traditionally, children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) are considered to be partially resistant to growth hormone (GH), being, therefore less responsive to GH administration in comparison to children with GH deficiency (GHD). Moreover, the reimbursement policy for GH administration for short stature in children state that GH should be administrated for a more severe height deficiency in ISS (below −3 SD) in comparison to GHD (−2 SD). &lt;b&gt;The aim of the study&lt;/b&gt; was to evaluate whether children with short stature due to idiopathic isolated GHD (IGHD) respond differently to somatropinum administration in comparison to ISS children. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Material and methods&lt;/st&gt; patients were 155 children (age 2,9–12 years, 106 male/49 female) diagnosed with ISS (32 patients) and IGHD (123 patients) and treated according to the national protocol for 3,6 years. Standard deviation scores (SDS) for height were calculated at different time points and compared between the two groups. A favourable response to treatment was considered an increase in height with at least 0,5 SD year. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt; SDS for height at the first evaluation was similar between groups (mean of −3,3 for ISS and −3,1 for IGHD). A similar proportion of patients had a favourable response to treatment during follow-up (71,5% of IGHD and 71,9% of ISS children, p=NS), with a mean recovered SDS for the height of 1,56±0,4 SD in IGHD and 1,48±0,52 SD in ISS group (p=NS). No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed for the gain in SDS for height at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of follow-up, the highest response occurring in the first 18 months. The doses of somatropinum administered were not statistically different in the two groups. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusion&lt;/st&gt; our study showed that the responsiveness to somatropinum administration is similar in patients with ISS and IGHD diagnosed based on current GH cut-offs. Therefore, readjustment of height deficit criteria for GH administration for these two categories of patients should be taken into consideration in order to improve cost efficiency. &lt;/sec&gt;

BackgroundFew studies have compared the response to growth hormone (GH) treatment between indications such as isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD), born small for gestational age (SGA), idiopathic short stature (ISS), and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD). The aim of this analysis of data, collected from two large ongoing observational outcome studies, was to evaluate growth and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response data for children of short stature with IGHD, MPHD, SGA, or ISS following two years of treatment with the recombinant GH product Norditropin® (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark).MethodsAnalysis of auxologic data from two ongoing prospective observational studies, NordiNet® International Outcomes Study (NordiNet® IOS) and NovoNet®/American Norditropin® Studies: Web-enabled Research (ANSWER) Program®.Results4,582 children aged <18 years were included: IGHD, n = 3,298; SGA, n = 678; ISS, n = 334; and MPHD, n = 272. After two years’ GH treatment, change in height standard deviation score (SDS) was +1.03 in SGA and +0.84 in ISS vs. +0.97 in IGHD (p = 0.047; p < 0.001 vs. IGHD, respectively). Height gain was comparable between IGHD and MPHD. In pre-pubertal children vs. total population, height SDS change after two years was: IGHD, +1.24 vs. +0.97; SGA, +1.17 vs. +1.03; ISS, +1.04 vs. +0.84; and MPHD, +1.16 vs. +0.99 (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsAfter two years’ GH treatment, change in height SDS was greater in SGA and less in ISS, compared with IGHD; the discrepancy in responses may be due to the disease nature or confounders (i.e. age). Height SDS increase was greatest in pre-pubertal children, supporting early treatment initiation to optimize growth outcomes.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of recombinant human growth hormone in treating idiopathic short stature and growth hormone deficiency in children

IntroductionShort stature has many causes, including rare disorders of GH function. Bioinactive growth hormone (GH) refers to a phenotype characterized by immunoreactive but biologically ineffective GH. Importantly, it should not be regarded as a separate treatment but rather as a definable subgroup within the broader population of children receiving recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the growth response to rhGH among children with bioinactive GH, those born small for gestational age (SGA), and those with idiopathic short stature (ISS).MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center study, we reviewed the medical records of short-statured patients with a height ≤ –2 z-score, a normal peak GH response (≥10 ng/mL) to clonidine or L-dopa stimulation tests, and a history of rhGH treatment. Patients with chronic illness, malnutrition, syndromic or endocrine disorders, diabetes, metabolic disease, anemia, or prior pubertal suppression were excluded. Eligible patients meeting the definitions of bioinactive GH, SGA, or ISS were included.Statistical AnalysisData were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 using parametric and non-parametric tests with Bonferroni correction; significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsAmong 170 patients screened, 109 fulfilled the criteria for analysis (bioinactive GH, n=8; SGA, n=27; ISS, n=74). Baseline Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) and Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels were markedly lower in the bioinactive GH group compared with SGA and ISS (p < 0.001). During rhGH therapy, patients with bioinactive GH exhibited the greatest gains in growth velocity and Δ height z-score, despite similar GH doses and a lower proportion of pubertal subjects. By final height, all patients with bioinactive GH achieved normal stature, with most surpassing target height, whereas fewer SGA and ISS patients reached their genetic potential.ConclusionChildren with bioinactive GH form a biologically distinct and highly treatment-responsive subgroup of non-GHD short stature. Our findings highlight the diagnostic value of IGF-1 generation testing in this context. Future multicenter studies with genetic and bioactivity confirmation are essential to refine diagnostic criteria and establish international guidelines.

Background: Variability still exist about the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS). We describe the growth response to rhGH therapy for >2 years in 20 prepubertal children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and 18 children with GH deficiency (GHD) and compared them with 15 children with ISS who did not receive rhGH therapy. Patients and methods: Our study included 35 prepubertal and peripubertal (Tanner 1 and 2) children with short stature (Ht-SDS <-2) and/or Ht-SDS >1SD below their mid parental height SD (MP-Ht-SDS) with slow growth velocity (<-1 SD), with normal peak GH response to provocation tests (15.5±6.5 ng/dl), normal IGF-I SDS (-0.9±0.6), and no bone age delay (± 1 year from chronological age) (ISS). 20 children were treated for 2.5±1.5 years with rhGH 0.05 mg/kg/day and 15 children were not treated with rhGH. 18 children with diagnosis of GHD, diagnosed in the same period, receiving rhGH therapy served as controls. We assessed the linear growth and IGF-I levels of all children for an average of 2 years. Results: Children with ISS on rhGH therapy had a height gain of 0.77 SD in 2 years versus 1.05 SD in GHD children, with significant increase in IGF-I and normal progression of bone age and puberty. Children with ISS who did not receive rhGH had no gain in the changes of Ht-SDS inspite of normal progression of bone age and puberty. The difference between children Ht-SDS and mid-parental height SDS (MP-Ht-SDS) changed significantly from -1.1±3 to -0.3±0.5 in the ISS group and from -1.35±0.5 to -0.3±0.25 in the GHD group, after an average of 2 years of treatment. In the treated ISS group, the Ht-SDS gain was correlated positively with the duration of rhGH therapy (r = 0.82, p<0.0001), negatively with the age at the start of treatment (r = -0.544, p = 0.01), and positively with the bone age (r =-0.44, p = 0.04). Discussion: The Ht-SDS of children with ISS on rhGH treatment closely approached their MP-Ht-SDS after 2 years of rhGH therapy while those who did not receive rhGH kept the same distance from their MP-Ht-SDS after 2 years. Analysis of possible factors affecting linear growth in children with ISS on rhGH therapy showed that children below 9 years with Ht-SDS <-2.5 SD and those with Ht-SDS >1SD below MP-Ht-SDS grew better on rhGH therapy compared to older children and those with Ht-SDS >-2.5 and were less than 1SD from their MP-HT-SD. Higher doses of rhGH (to keep IGF-I in high normal levels) and longer duration of therapy improved the Ht-SDS gain of these children. Conclusion: We report significant gain in Ht-SDS in prepubertal children with ISS on rhGH therapy and better response in younger children and in those with Ht-SDS > 1 SD below their MP-Ht-SDS. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Growth hormone therapy with three dosage regimens in children with idiopathic short stature