Abstract
Summary — Root system morphology and growth of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var glauca (Beissn) Franco) and Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var latifolia Engelm) saplings transplanted from containers to the field in 1979 were compared with naturally-regenerated saplings of the same species and age. Naturally-regenerated saplings of both species were significantly taller than planted trees, had greater leader growth in the previous year and height/diameter ratios, and smaller taproot diameters 10 cm below groundline. Naturally-regenerated saplings also had up to 2.3-fold the number of lateral roots compared with planted saplings. Seventy to 79% of all primary lateral roots of naturally-regenerated saplings occurred within the top 10 cm of the soil surface, compared with 3042% for the planted trees. The depth of the first structural lateral root associated with naturallyregenerated saplings was also significantly less than that of planted saplings. The shape of the container in which seedlings were raised in the nursery was clearly evident when root system architecture of planted saplings was examined. Many container-initiated seedling root systems exhibited conical shaping with little lateral root egress. A variety of root deformities which included constriction, coiling and kinkiness were detected in planted, but not naturally-regenerated saplings. These results are discussed in relation to potential difficulties arising from artificial forest regeneration with pine and Douglas fir.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.