Group‐Theoretical Discussion on the E/Z‐Nomenclature for Ethylene Derivatives. Discrimination Between RS‐Stereoisomeric Groups and Stereoisomeric Groups.

Abstract

The hierarchy of point groups, RS-stereoisomeric groups, stereoisomeric groups, and isoskeletal groups is discussed to comprehend the chirality, RS-stereogenicity, stereogenicity, and isoskeletal isomerism for ethylene derivatives. The RS-stereoisomeric groups for ethylene derivatives have been clarified not to coincide with their stereoisomeric groups, so that diastereomers (E/Z-isomers) are not identical with RS-diastereomers. To discuss the relationship among RS-diastereomers, m-diastereomers, and isoskeletal isomers, we have proposed the concepts of extended stereoisograms and extended stereoisogram sets, where the term is coined to show its difference from the traditional term diastereomer. Thereby, ethylene derivatives are classified into Types II-II/II-II/II-II, IV-IV/IV-IV/IV-IV, etc. on the basis of relevant stereoisograms (Types I to V). The stereoisomerism of ethylenes has been concluded to be treated in terms of m-diastereomers characterized by the E/Z-nomenclature but not to be treated in terms of RS-diastereomers characterized by the RS-nomenclaure.