Abstract

As the largest freshwater storage in the world, groundwater plays an important role in maintaining ecosystems and helping humans adapt to climate change. However, groundwater dynamics, such as groundwater recharge, cannot be measured directly and is influenced by spatially and temporally complex processes, models are therefore required to capture the dynamics and provide scientific advice for decision-making. This paper developed, estimated and compared the performance of linear regression, multi-layer perception (MLP) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models in predicting groundwater recharge. The experimental dataset consists of time series of annual recharge from the year 1970 to 2012, based on water table fluctuation estimates from 465 bores in the states of South Australia and Victoria, Australia. We identified the factors that influenced groundwater recharge and found that the correlation between rainfall and groundwater recharge was strongest. The linear regression model had the poorest fitting performance, with the root mean squared error (RMSE) being greater than 0.19 when various proportions of training data were considered. The MLP model outperformed the linear regression in the prediction capability, achieving RMSE = 0.11 when 80% of training data was considered. The LSTM model was found to have the best performance, whose root mean squared errors were less than 0.12 when various proportions of training data were applied. The relative importance of influential predictors was evaluated using the above three models.

Highlights

  • Robust groundwater recharge estimates are a primary requirement for effective management of water resources and sustainable use of groundwater [1], which plays an important role in the sustainable development of regional societies and economies [2,3]

  • The annual time series of regional groundwater recharge was established by averaging the groundwater recharge estimates temporally for each year and spatially based on data from all available bores

  • The three models were developed to predict groundwater recharge using the full set of influential predictors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Robust groundwater recharge estimates are a primary requirement for effective management of water resources and sustainable use of groundwater [1], which plays an important role in the sustainable development of regional societies and economies [2,3]. Models are usually required to help stakeholders understand groundwater recharge, identify the key processes influencing the rate of groundwater recharge, and to inform pathways for sustainable water resources management [6]. Previous studies on groundwater recharge have outlined numerous methods for estimating recharge, including chemical tracers [7,8,9,10,11], physical methods [12,13,14,15,16,17] and mathematical approaches [18,19]. The CMB method cannot estimate the negative component (groundwater evapotranspiration) of net recharge [1], cannot be applied to groundwater discharge regions. The WB method provides an estimate of net recharge—a combination of recharge to and evapotranspiration from the groundwater, while the water fluctuation method provides an estimate of gross recharge [20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.