Abstract

AbstractOne of the consequences of the so-called “memoir boom” of the 1990s and early 2000s is that it both reflected and generated an enormous hunger for memoirs of grief and suffering; these memoirs combine to provide that increasingly codified genre of storytelling (what the Bookseller magazine and industry jargon term “misery lit”) with fixed conventions. Here, I look at two memoirs, Helene Cooper’s The House at Sugar Beach (2009) and Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking (2007), in order to trace writerly strategies of resistance against the modes of interpretation that the genre expectations of the grief memoir create. I analyze the moves that the writers make in order to honor the stories they tell despite the pressures that attend generic discourses of suffering, including where those discourses are moored to racial and gender associations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.