Abstract

Climate change together with population growth and land-use change have increased the risk of urban floods. Urban floods cause severe damages to cities and their inhabitants, and they are expected to increase over time. Consequently, urban adaptation is required to shift from traditional infrastructure (grey) to multifunctional infrastructure (blue-green) for improved flood management. Until recently, studies on the role and adoption of blue-green infrastructure have centered around large cities in developed countries, including Melbourne and Rotterdam, among others. Meanwhile, middle-sized cities in developing countries have received less attention. According to the Urban Water Management Transition Framework (UWMTF), cities in developing countries can learn from the experiences of developed cities and leapfrog to more ‘water sensitive’ practices. Although leapfrogging is context-dependent, our understanding of factors that support leapfrogging remains embryonic. This paper contributes to the scholarly understanding of the governance factors that support and limit leapfrogging. By applying the Governance Assessment Tool through semi-structured interviews and reviewing secondary data, this research assessed the implementation of flood protection infrastructure in San Pedro Cholula, a middle size city of Mexico. This work found the most supportive quality for delivering multifunctional infrastructure, was the extent of the governance system. The governance support extent was rated as moderate-low considering the platform for change is limited to government actors, which has further reinforced traditional approaches to infrastructure. In addition, the necessary governance features of coherence, flexibility and intensity were assessed as constraining change, with flexibility being the least supportive governance factor and ultimately hindering social actors’ participation and innovation. While the contemporary governance arrangements of San Pedro Cholula are not yet conducive to promoting a leapfrog in the delivery of urban flood infrastructure, the analysis has pointed to three catalytic factors to underpin a leapfrogging situation: trans-disciplinary science; cross-sector partnerships; and, innovation experiments.

Highlights

  • Urban flood recurrences have been increasing in the world due to various factors such as climate change, population growth, changes in land use and aging or inadequate infrastructures [1]

  • This research will assess the governance factors that support and restrict the implementation of blue-green infrastructure (BGI) to leapfrog by asking the following question: How does the governance context affect the implementation of BGI for leapfrogging towards a WSCs? The section will explain the concept of leapfrogging in a more detailed manner

  • The application of the Governance Assessment Tool (GAT) has allowed a systematic understanding of the governance context and its support for leapfrogging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban flood recurrences have been increasing in the world due to various factors such as climate change, population growth, changes in land use and aging or inadequate infrastructures [1]. IInn tthhiiss sseennssee,, uurrbbaann wwaatteerr sscchhoollaarrss hhaavvee lloonngg ccaalllleedd ffoorr cchhaannggee iinn tthhee sseeccttoorr. The paper contributes empirical insights regarding the governance challenges by assessing the governance context of the flood infrastructure policy through the development of green, grey and blue-green infrastructure in middle size cities in Mexico. It is often argued there are systemic issues that often need addressing before such ‘leapfrogging’, cities or countries may have path dependent institutions and governance mechanisms that prevent such innovative technology adoption. This research will assess the governance factors that support and restrict the implementation of BGI to leapfrog by asking the following question: How does the governance context affect the implementation of BGI for leapfrogging towards a WSCs? The section will explain the concept of leapfrogging in a more detailed manner

The Leapfrogging Concept
Theoretical Framework for the Governance Assessment
Methodology
Extent
Coherence
Flexibility
Intensity
Findings
Discussion of Results and Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.