Global Justice Index Report 2024

The Global Justice Index is a multiyear research project based at Fudan Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences that assesses the contributions made by each country to achieving greater global justice. We have published results from 2010 to 2019 in Global Justice Index Report, Global Justice Index Report 2020, Global Justice Index Report 2021, and we are now presenting our fourth-year results for 2020 in Global Justice Index Report 2022, which is an updated version of previous years’ reports. This year, we take into account changes to global justice influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. The report consists of four sections: introduction, findings, main results, and conclusion. In the introduction, we discuss the development of the conceptual framework and evaluative principles to justify our selection of the dimensions and indicators for measurement. Next, in the findings section, we report the data, indicators, and our results for each country for each of the 10 issues we identify, and provide regional comparisons for Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America, Africa, and Oceania. In the following section, we present the main results for the global justice indices, and report the ranking of each country’s contribution to achieving greater global justice. In the final section, we discuss the applications and limitations of the index and potential further research trajectories.

The Global Justice Index is a multiyear research project based at Fudan Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences that assesses the contributions made by each country to achieving greater global justice. In 2019, we completed the first-year measures, using the rankings of nation-states at the global level based on data from 2010 to 2017. This was published under the title of the Global Justice Index Report in Chinese Political Science Review (Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020). The Global Justice Index Report 2020 is the second annual report based on our work, analyzing data from 2010 to 2018, which was concluded in 2020, and published in Chinese Political Science Review (Vol. 6, No. 3, 2021). This is the third annual report in our series, and here, we provide the results with the rankings of promoting global justice by nation-states at the global level based on data in the year of 2019. The report broadly consists of four sections: introduction, findings, main results, and conclusion. In the introduction, we discuss the development of the conceptual framework and evaluative principles to justify our selection of the dimensions and indicators for measurement. Next, in the findings section, we report the data, indicators, and our results for each country for each of the 10 issues we identify, and provide regional comparisons for Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America, Africa, and Oceania. In the following section, we present the main results for the global justice indices, and report the ranking of each country’s contribution to achieving greater global justice. In the final section, we discuss the applications and limitations of the index and potential further research trajectories.

The Global Justice Index is a multiyear research project based at Fudan Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences that assesses the contributions made by each country to achieving greater global justice. We have published results for yeas from 2010 to 2020 in Global Justice Index Report from 2019 to 2022, and are now presenting our fifth year of results, covering data from 2021 in Global Justice Index Report 2023, which is an updated version of previous years’ reports. But, we have been improving our index year by year to with changes that have taken place globally. We have also refined our imputation methodology to better address the challenge of missing data. The report consists of four sections: introduction, findings, main results, and conclusion. In the introduction, we discuss the development of the conceptual framework and evaluative principles to justify our selection of the dimensions and indicators for measurement. Next, in the findings section, we report the data, indicators, and our results for each country for each of the 10 issues we identify, and provide regional comparisons for Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America, Africa, and Oceania. In the following section, we present the main results for the global justice indices, and report the ranking of each country’s contribution to achieving greater global justice. In the final section, we discuss the applications and limitations of the index and potential further research trajectories.

Introduction: the Sociology of Medical Science and Technology

Joseph Alois Schumpeter worked at Chernivtsi city for almost two academic years (1909-1911). During this time, he wrote one of his major works, The Theory of Economic Development, a series of articles that were important for his subsequent economic, sociological and political science research. So, regarding his famous work “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1942) he spoke out that his ideas were founded back in 1910-1911 during discussions of lectures about the state and society. On the basis of university lectures Schumpeter's brochure “How does one study social science” was prepared and published. Social science, it says, is a doctrine of social events, the science of what unites the state and society, determines the behaviour and fate of social groups and individuals, in short, the science of social being and the formation of human. Schumpeter emphasizes that there is no single social science. There are only separate social sciences, which neither form a single organic whole nor agree with each other at all. Schumpeter believed that political economy was the oldest and better developed social science. Further, the brochure highlights sociology (the doctrine of the relationship between individuals and groups of individuals in the social whole), the doctrine of religion, the doctrine of law, folk psychology. Describing the essence of the social sciences, Schumpeter noticed that they were doing the same thing as the natural ones. They collect factual material and try to find certain patterns in it. The study of social sciences, according to Schumpeter, can contribute to seeing things in the right proportion, distinguishing the essential from the non-essential, and the causes from the consequences. Keywords: social science; the essence of social science; sociology; the doctrine of law; the value of the social sciences; the study of the social sciences

This paper reports the results of a ten‐year search for consensus among scientific findings on the nature of the origin and development of moral sensitivity and morality. Significant agreement on six underlying factors was found. Based on these foundations, a new theory of moral transformation and a scientific “global ethic” relating to the global ethic of Hans Kung and the Parliament of the World's Religions is proposed. Fields surveyed include psychology, sociology, political science, economics, history, and gender and feminist studies in social science; physics and biology in natural science; and brain research, archaeology, and both old and new evolutionary studies and theory, including chaos, self‐organizing, and other nonlinear theories, in systems science.

Competitive Intelligence ReviewVolume 8, Issue 2 p. 90-92 Cl Perspectives Hakluyt & Company: Fitzroy mocleon's last venture Stevan Dedijer, Stevan Dedijer Stevan Dedijer, a SCIP Meritorious Award winner, is one of the founders of modern economic and business intelligence. He is the author of more than 150 papers and reports in the fields of intelligence, security, and “social intelligence.” He was founder and director of the Research Policy Institute at Lund University in Sweden, where he also taught intelligence and security courses, was a Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Studies in Social Sciences in Palo Alto, and has served as a consultant to numerous corporations, governments, and international bodies. He can be reached at Vicka Lovrina 4, Dubrovnik 20000, Croatia; Tel. & Fax: 385-20-411-613.Search for more papers by this author Stevan Dedijer, Stevan Dedijer Stevan Dedijer, a SCIP Meritorious Award winner, is one of the founders of modern economic and business intelligence. He is the author of more than 150 papers and reports in the fields of intelligence, security, and “social intelligence.” He was founder and director of the Research Policy Institute at Lund University in Sweden, where he also taught intelligence and security courses, was a Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Studies in Social Sciences in Palo Alto, and has served as a consultant to numerous corporations, governments, and international bodies. He can be reached at Vicka Lovrina 4, Dubrovnik 20000, Croatia; Tel. & Fax: 385-20-411-613.Search for more papers by this author First published: 16 October 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880080216Citations: 1 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume8, Issue2Summer 1997Pages 90-92 RelatedInformation

This paper reports the results of a ten year search for consensus among scientific findings on the nature of the origin and development of moral sensitivity and morality. Fields surveyed include psychology, sociology, political science, economics, history, and gender and feminist studies in social science; physics and biology in natural science; and brain research, old and new evolutionary studies and theory, including chaos, self‐organizing, and other nonlinear theories in systems science. An agreement on six underlying factors was found. Based on these “foundations,” a new theory of moral transformation and a new global ethic are proposed.

Skip to content The Role of Community Participation in Tourism Growth around Lake Bunyonyi in Uganda The Role of Community Participation in Tourism Growth around Lake Bunyonyi in Uganda – Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies Skip to content Toggle navigation Home About Us Submit Manuscript Contact Us Search × Search Close <! --- .row ---> <! --- .container ---> Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies Abbreviation: Direct Res. J .Soc. Sci. Edu. Studies | ISSN: 2449-0806 | DOI: 10.26765/DRJSSES Impact Factor: 2.500 | Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed | Start Year: 2013 Submit your manuscripts for peer review and publication in the monthly issues of Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies Click https://directresearchpublisher.org/drjsses/submit-manuscript for online submission (PDF) Full-Text See Related Articles: On Google On Google Scholar Articles on Google by: Nshabaruhanga, Praise* Athieno Petrolina .O. Mukasa CURRENT ISSUE: MenuDRJSSES HomeAbout DRJSSESInstruction for AuthorsDRJSSES Aims & ScopeDRJSSES Editorial PolicyDRJSSES Editorial BoardSubmit ManuscriptTrack ManuscriptAnti-Plagiarism PolicyPeer Review ProcessPublication EthicsPartial Waiver PolicyMake PaymentDRJSSES IndexingDRJSSES ArchiveDRJSSES ArticlesCLOSE Original Research Article The Role of Community Participation in Tourism Growth around Lake Bunyonyi in Uganda Nshabaruhanga, Praise* Athieno Petrolina .O. Mukasa Article Number: DRJSSES76122285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJSSES76122285 ISSN: 2449-0806 Vol. 11(1), Pp. 1-6, January 2023 Copyright © 2023 Author retain the copyright of this article This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. Full-Text (PDF) Abstract Article Publishing History Cite as Abstract The increase in tourism activities has increased community participation and involvement in the achievement of tourism growth. This study assessed the role of community participation in tourism growth around Lake Bunyonyi with Kitumba and Bufundi as selected areas of the study. This study was guided by two specific objectives of the study that were to; determine the tourism products offered by the local community around Lake Bunyonyi, and determine the challenges local communities face in promoting tourism around Lake Bunyonyi. A cross-sectional study collecting qualitative and quantitative data was conducted from 378 study participants including; Tour guides, hotel, restaurant, and guest house employees, small businessmen, farmers, local leaders, fishermen, and some government officials responsible for the tourism industry. The quantitative data were assigned numerical codes before being edited and entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. (Armonk, New York, USA). Frequencies and percentages were used to achieve the objectives. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Results indicated that of the 378 respondents, 256 (67.7%) were males, 139 (36.8%) were aged 31-40, 219 (57.8%) were married, 152 (40.2%), 378 (100.0%) were Ugandans, and 158 (41.8%) of the respondents come from the families with more than 6 people. 372 (98.4%) of the respondents agree that there are tourism activities around Lake Bunyonyi, and the main tourist attraction is Lake Bunyonyi, and the major activity around Lake Bunyonyi is the Boat ride 98 (25.9%). The major challenges faced by the local communities in promoting tourism around Lake Bunyonyi Include; Inadequate capital for investment 102 (27.0%), Natural calamities 51 (11.1%), Language barrier, and Poor government policy in implementing its policies relating to tourism issues respectively 42 (11.1%), Lack of support from the government as well as lack of funding 34 (9.0%). It is recommended that the government fulfill its pledge to construct tarmac roads around the lake and provide a ferry for inland transportation, provision of equal opportunities to the locals around Lake Bunyonyi, More investments are needed especially in accommodation and recreation highly recommended as well as improved standards of living. Full-Text (PDF) Keywords: Community Participation, Tourism Growth, Lake Bunyonyi Received: December 5, 2022 Accepted: January 13, 2023 Published: January 17, 2023 Article Publishing History Plagiarism Check: | Article Received on : December 5, 2022 | Revised Copy Received on: | Reviewed by: | Final Approval by: | Article Accepted on : January 13, 2023 | Article Published : January 17, 2023 How to Cite this Article Nshabaruhanga, P. and Athieno P. O. M.(2023).The Role of Community Participation in Tourism Growth around Lake Bunyonyi in Uganda.Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies. Vol. 11(1), Pp. 1-6. https://directresearchpublisher.org/drjsses/files/2023/01/The-Role-of-Community-Participation-in-Tourism-Growth-around-Lake-Bunyonyi-in-Uganda.pdf https://directresearchpublisher.org/drjsses/files/2023/01/The-Role-of-Community-Participation-in-Tourism-Growth-around-Lake-Bunyonyi-in-Uganda.pdf Copyright © 2023 Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies Direct Research Center publishes peer-reviewed, open access online journals in areas of Agriculture and Food science, Biology and Biotechnology, Health and Pharmacology, Chemistry and Material science, Engineering and Information Technology and Social Science and Educational Studies. © 2023 Direct Research Journals . Terms of Use

Joseph Alois Schumpeter worked at Chernivtsi city for almost two academic years (1909-1911). During this time, he wrote one of his major works, The Theory of Economic Development, a series of articles that were important for his subsequent economic, sociological and political science research. So, regarding his famous work “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1942) he spoke out that his ideas were founded back in 1910-1911 during discussions of lectures about the state and society. On the basis of university lectures Schumpeter's brochure “How does one study social science” was prepared and published. Social science, it says, is a doctrine of social events, the science of what unites the state and society, determines the behaviour and fate of social groups and individuals, in short, the science of social being and the formation of human. Schumpeter emphasizes that there is no single social science. There are only separate social sciences, which neither form a single organic whole nor agree with each other at all. Schumpeter believed that political economy was the oldest and better developed social science. Further, the brochure highlights sociology (the doctrine of the relationship between individuals and groups of individuals in the social whole), the doctrine of religion, the doctrine of law, folk psychology. Describing the essence of the social sciences, Schumpeter noticed that they were doing the same thing as the natural ones. They collect factual material and try to find certain patterns in it. The study of social sciences, according to Schumpeter, can contribute to seeing things in the right proportion, distinguishing the essential from the non-essential, and the causes from the consequences. Keywords: social science; the essence of social science; sociology; the doctrine of law; the value of the social sciences; the study of the social sciences

Perspectives in Social Sciences I: Historical Dimensions. Edited by Barun De. Calcutta: Oxford University Press, published for Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, 1977. xii, 227 pp. Figures, Plates. No price. - Volume 40 Issue 1

This article discusses trends in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in social sciences and natural sciences research. The introduction highlights how AI has evolved into an essential tool in both fields, addressing the limitations of traditional methods in social sciences and accelerating data analysis in natural sciences. The research method used is bibliometric analysis, with data collected from Google Scholar using keywords related to AI in social and natural sciences. Relevant articles were selected through a content evaluation and exclusion process, resulting in 1,000 social science publications and 999 natural science publications, which were further analyzed using VOSviewer with such as being outside the five-year range (published from 2020 to 2025). The study's findings indicate that in social sciences, AI is widely used to enhance research effectiveness through faster data processing, particularly in higher education and social policy analysis. Additionally, AI studies in social sciences are expanding, focusing on ethics, regulation, and human-AI interaction. In natural sciences, AI plays a crucial role in resource management, environmental research, and the healthcare industry, including disease diagnosis and drug development. Recent trends also show an increasing use of large language models (LLMs) and natural language processing (NLP) in scientific research. The study concludes that AI has become a key element in both social and natural science research. Recommendations for social science researchers include further exploration of AI’s impact on psychology, law, and education, as well as the use of bibliometric methods. Meanwhile, natural science researchers are advised to focus on improving AI transparency, developing more accurate technologies, and applying AI in environmental and industrial research. Interdisciplinary collaboration is necessary to ensure AI development remains ethical and inclusive.

This chapter examines the continuing disparities between Whites and Blacks through extensive social science data and studies of the impacts of systemic racism. It first utilizes what demographers call the dissimilarity index to measure housing segregation in major metropolitan areas; cities with heavily Black populations, such as Detroit, have become “hyper-segregated” with almost total “social isolation” of Blacks. The chapter then examines the long-standing academic and political debates over the causes of systemic racism, beginning in 1965 with a government report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, by a young Labor Department aide, Daniel Patrick “Pat” Moynihan. He found the main cause of Black poverty and increasing single Black motherhood in the “pathology” of a “matriarchal” Black family structure in which males are neither needed nor welcome. Moynihan’s report spurred an angry rebuttal in a book by psychology professor William Ryan, Blaming the Victim, which found the main cause of Black poverty in the systemic racism of White society and culture. The chapter then looks at social science studies by William Julius Wilson (explaining the “racial invariance” of White and Black crime); psychologist John Dollard (explaining the prevalence of Black-on-Black crime with the “frustration-aggression-displacement” theory); and Black psychiatrists William Grier and Price Cobbs (explaining “Black rage” as rooted in White control of institutions that exclude or discriminate against Blacks). The chapter concludes with a look at the War on Drugs of the 1980s and 1990s and the resulting mass incarceration of Black men.

Interview given by two ex-presidents of ANPOCS, professors Fabio Wanderley Reis (political scientist) and Gilberto Velho (anthropologist) as well as by the president in function, professor Elisa Reis (sociologist) on the progress achieved regarding the development of research and post-graduation studies in social science in Brazil. The answers of the interviewed have been grouped into four topics: social science as presently practiced in Brazil; development of research and graduate studies in Social Science; relationship between the Brazilian academic community and the international community; main research themes and methodological approaches; impact of Social Science on Brazilian society and main problems and perspectives of Social Science in Brazil.

After briefly surveying three generations of comparative sociologists, interdisciplinary regional and trans-regional studies are shown to complement the work of the third generation of comparative sociologists on civilizational analysis and multiple modernities. Drawing examples from the interdisciplinary Persianate studies, promoted by the Association for the Study of Persianate Societies in the last two decades, and by other recent interdisciplinary studies of performance and world literature as well as Caribbean regional studies, it is argued that the rise of interdisciplinary studies in social sciences and humanities may in fact redeem the unfulfilled promise that comparative sociology once offered. These recent studies constitute a significant contribution to our theoretical understanding of different patterns of socio-cultural development beyond the West, whose historical experience gave birth to modern social science disciplines, and thereby to register the historical experience of a very sizeable portion of humankind as the basis for the reconstruction of social theory in the global age.