Abstract
AbstractThe author agrees with Nye’s correction of two errors in a previous paper; but disagrees with his other objections. Evidence is put forward for the significance of a second approximation in the theoretical equation for the profile of a glacier; for instance, it explains why bulges of increased thickness travel down glacier faster than the ice. Features of the front of the Glacier de Saint-Sorlin are reported. An attempt is made to explain crevasse formation in glaciers and the upturning of blue bands at the foot of an ice fall.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
