Abstract
In this study we demonstrate how energy and mass fluxes vary in space and time for Grey and Tyndall glaciers at the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI). Despite the overall glacier retreat of most Patagonian glaciers, a recent increase in mass loss has been observed, but individual glaciers respond differently in terms of spatial and temporal changes. In this context, the detailed investigation of the effect of mass balance processes on recent glacier response to climate forcing still needs refinement. We therefore quantify surface energy-fluxes and climatic mass balance of the two neighboring glaciers, Grey and Tyndall. The COupled Snow and Ice energy and MAss balance model COSIMA is applied to assess recent surface energy and climatic mass balance variability with a high temporal and spatial resolution for a 16-year period between April 2000 to March 2016. The model is driven by downscaled 6-hourly atmospheric data derived from ERA-Interim reanalysis and MODIS/Terra Snow Cover and validated against ablation measurements made in single years. High resolution precipitation fields are determined by using an analytical orographic precipitation model. Frontal ablation is estimated as residual of climatic mass balance and geodetic mass balance derived from TanDEM-X/SRTM between 2000 and 2014. We simulate a positive glacier-wide mean annual climatic mass balance of +1.02$\pm$0.52\,m\,w.e. a$^{-1}$ for Grey Glacier and of +0.68$\pm$0.54\,m\,w.e. a$^{-1}$ for Tyndall Glacier between 2000 and 2014. Climatic mass balance results show a high year to year variability. Comparing climatic mass balance results with previous studies underlines the high uncertainty in climatic mass balance modeling with respect to accumulation on the SPI. Due to the lack of observations accumulation estimates differ from previous studies based on the methodological approaches. Mean annual ice loss by frontal ablation is estimated to be 2.07$\pm$0.70\,m\,w.e.\,a$^{-1}$ for Grey Glacier and 3.26$\pm$0.82\,m\,w.e.\,a$^{-1}$ for Tyndall Glacier between 2000 and 2014. Ice loss by surface ablation exceeds ice loss by frontal ablation for both glaciers. The overall mass balance of Grey and Tyndall glaciers are clearly negative with -1.05$\pm$0.18\,m\,w.e.\,a$^{-1}$ and -2.58$\pm$0.28\,m\,w.e.\,a$^{-1}$ respectively.
Highlights
Most Patagonian glaciers have been thinning and retreating at high rates during the past decades
In this study we demonstrate how energy and mass fluxes vary in space and time for Grey and Tyndall glaciers at the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI)
Results of downscaled air temperature, solar radiation and precipitation will be discussed in more detail
Summary
Most Patagonian glaciers have been thinning and retreating at high rates during the past decades. Mass loss of the Northern Patagonia Icefield (NPI) and the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI) contributed to sea-level rise by 0.042 ± 0.002 mm a−1 between 1964/1975 and 2000 (Rignot et al, 2003), increasing to 0.067 ± 0.004 mm a−1 between 2000 and 2012 (Willis et al, 2012b). The main driver of the long-term demise of the icefields is most likely to be the warming climate (e.g., Rignot et al, 2003; Sakakibara and Sugiyama, 2014). Observed annual air temperatures at surface stations have increased by + 0.04◦C to + 1.4◦C south of 46◦S during the past century (Rosenblüth et al, 1995). No significant trend of precipitation has been observed since 1950, but large inter-annual and decadal variations have been found (Carrasco et al, 2008; Aravena and Luckman, 2009; Lenaerts et al, 2014). Reanalysis data from 1960 to 2000 show a slight decrease in solid precipitation over the ice-fields as a result of increasing air temperatures (Rasmussen et al, 2007)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
