Abstract
Cities across the world are in the grip of an intensifying housing crisis, in which access to affordable, secure, and appropriate housing is increasingly inaccessible for the majority. There is rising pressure on stakeholders to find solutions but, simultaneously, persistent opposition to housing models that contest the neoliberal logics which prioritise housing's financialisation. In this context, many proposed and developed “solutions” have focused on how housing can – in the words of one entry to an architectural competition – “GET SMALLER.” Termed “micro‐living,” a trend is emerging for housing models that shrink living spaces, either by providing self‐contained units at below minimum space standards or by offering “co‐living” tenancies in small private rooms with access to shared communal spaces. Presented as innovative and aspirational, micro‐living distinguishes itself from unequivocally problematic small housing, such as Hong Kong's “coffin homes” or the UK's “beds‐in‐sheds.” While micro‐living is transforming ways of imagining, producing, and inhabiting cities, it has, as yet, been little explored by geographers. Responding to this gap, this paper traces the emerging geographies of micro‐living in major Western cities and demonstrates the importance of the topic in Geography. As well as detailing micro‐living's typologies, we excavate the lineages of micro‐living and consider the discourses it draws on in self‐presenting as an aspirational form of homemaking. In doing so, we highlight some of the issues that micro‐living responds to, exacerbates, and entrenches, including the stunted opportunities of millennials since the 2008 recession and the precarity of contemporary labour economies.
Highlights
In 2015, New London Architecture (NLA) – a UK‐based research forum – ran a competition looking for ways to alleviate the housing crisis
It was met with manifold suggestions of ways that housing can, in the words of one entry, “GET SMALLER!” The competition exposed the explosion of interest and investment in what has been termed “micro‐living”; living spaces that don't conform to current minimum space standards
This paper has sketched the emergence of contemporary micro‐living typologies, situated micro‐living within other “compensatory” homemaking during an era of housing crisis, excavated the lineages of micro‐living, and explored discourses mobilised to promote and justify its development
Summary
In 2015, New London Architecture (NLA) – a UK‐based research forum – ran a competition looking for ways to alleviate the housing crisis. Micro‐living terminology is, and signals a set of new imaginaries around small living spaces that, we argue, act to normalise and naturalise housing crisis conditions. This trend includes the rise of property guardianship schemes (Ferreri et al, 2017), renting or buying in “blue space” (boats on waterways), and the promotion, in the UK's social housing sector, of “pop‐up” accommodation (Harris et al, 2019).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.