Abstract
Laboratory experiments were used to test for defenses against predation and costs of such defense in several geographic strains of Aedes triseriatus, a tree-hole dwelling mosquito. Strains of A. triseriatus from sympatry with the tree-hole dwelling predator Toxorhynchites rutilus produced more surviving adults when exposed to predation than did strains from allopatry to the predator. Sympatric strains also had greater survivorship under low food conditions without predation than did allopatric strains, although allopatric strains produced larger adults and had shorter development periods. Estimated per capita rate of population change was always greater for sympatric strains than for allopatric strains. These results show lower vulnerability to predation of sympatric vs allopatric strains, but do not support the hypothesis that defense against predation has associated costs. No evidence was found for differential ability to use physical complexity as a refuge from predation. These results suggest that environmental differences between sympatric and allopatric regions, such as different climates and different numbers of potential competing species, along with presence/absence of the predator, may influence vulnerability to predation, developmental plasticity, and resource use. The initial approach of viewing predation as the dominant ecological difference between sympatric and allopatric regions may be too simple.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.