Abstract

ESA defines as Earth Observation (EO) Level 2 information product a single-date multi-spectral (MS) image corrected for atmospheric, adjacency and topographic effects, stacked with its data-derived scene classification map (SCM), whose legend includes quality layers cloud and cloud-shadow. No ESA EO Level 2 product has ever been systematically generated at the ground segment. To fill the information gap from EO big data to ESA EO Level 2 product in compliance with the GEO-CEOS stage 4 validation (Val) guidelines, an off-the-shelf Satellite Image Automatic Mapper (SIAM) lightweight computer program was validated by independent means on an annual 30 m resolution Web-Enabled Landsat Data (WELD) image composite time-series of the conterminous U.S. (CONUS) for the years 2006–2009. The SIAM core is a prior knowledge-based decision tree for MS reflectance space hyperpolyhedralization into static color names. Typically, a vocabulary of MS color names in a MS data (hyper)cube and a dictionary of land cover (LC) class names in the scene-domain do not coincide and must be harmonized (reconciled). The present Part 1—Theory provides the multidisciplinary background of a priori color naming. The subsequent Part 2—Validation accomplishes a GEO-CEOS stage 4 Val of the test SIAM-WELD annual map time-series in comparison with a reference 30 m resolution 16-class USGS National Land Cover Data 2006 map, based on an original protocol for wall-to-wall thematic map quality assessment without sampling, where the test and reference maps feature the same spatial resolution and spatial extent, but whose legends differ and must be harmonized.

Highlights

  • Proposed by the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO) and the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), the implementation plan for years 2005–2015 of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) aimed at systematic transformation of multi-source Earth observation (EO) big data into timely, comprehensive and operational EO value-adding products and services (GEO, 2005), submitted to the GEO-CEOS Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation (QA4EO) calibration/validation (Cal/Val) requirements and suitable “to allow the access to the Right Information, in the Right Format, at the Right Time, to the Right People, to Make the Right Decisions” (Group on Earth Observation/Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (GEO-CEOS), 2010)

  • The lesson to be gained by these authors’ experience is that well-established remote sensing (RS) practices, such as 1D image analysis based on supervised data learning algorithms and thematic map quality assessment by means of a square and sorted confusion matrix (CMTRX) where test and reference thematic legends are the same, can become malpractices when an a priori dictionary of static color names is employed for MS image classification purposes in agreement with Equation (3) and common sense, see Table 3

  • To pursue the GEO-CEOS visionary goal of a GEOSS implementation plan for years 2005–2015 notyet accomplished by the RS community, this interdisciplinary work aimed at filling an analytic and pragmatic information gap from EO image big data to systematic European Space Agency (ESA) EO Level 2 product generation at the ground segment, never achieved to date by any EO data provider and postulated as necessary not sufficient pre-condition to GEOSS development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proposed by the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO) and the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), the implementation plan for years 2005–2015 of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) aimed at systematic transformation of multi-source Earth observation (EO) big data into timely, comprehensive and operational EO value-adding products and services (GEO, 2005), submitted to the GEO-CEOS Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation (QA4EO) calibration/validation (Cal/Val) requirements and suitable “to allow the access to the Right Information, in the Right Format, at the Right Time, to the Right People, to Make the Right Decisions” (Group on Earth Observation/Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (GEO-CEOS), 2010).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.