Genomic & structural diversity and functional role of potassium (K+) transport proteins in plants

B-cell lymphoma2 (Bcl-2)-associated athanogene (BAG) family proteins are evolutionary conserved across all eukaryotes. These proteins interact with HSP70/HSC70 and function as co-chaperones during stress response and developmental pathways. Compared to the animal counterpart, the BAG proteins in plants are much less studied and primarily Arabidopsis BAG proteins have been identified and characterized for their role in programmed cell death, homeostasis, growth and development, abiotic and biotic stress response. Here, we have identified BAG protein family (SlBAGs) in tomato, an economically important and a model fruit crop using genome-wide scanning. We have performed phylogenetic analysis, genes architecture assessment, chromosomal location and in silico promoter analysis. Our data suggest that SlBAGs show differential tissue specific expression pattern during plant development particularly fruit development and ripening. Furthermore, we reported that expression of SlBAGs is modulated during abiotic stresses and is regulated by stress hormones ABA and ethylene. In planta subcellular localization reveals their diverse subcellular localization, and many members are localized in nucleus and cytoplasm. Like previous reports, our protein–protein interaction network and yeast two-hybrid analysis uncover that SlBAGs interact with HSP70. The current study provides insights into role of SlBAGs in plant development particualry fruit ripening and abiotic stress response.

RING zinc finger proteins have a conserved RING domain, mainly function as E3 ubiquitin ligases, and play important roles in plant growth, development, and the responses to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, temperature, reactive oxygen species, and harmful metals. RING zinc finger proteins act in abiotic stress responses mainly by modifying and degrading stress-related proteins. Here, we review the latest progress in research on RING zinc finger proteins, including their structural characteristics, classification, subcellular localization, and physiological functions, with an emphasis on abiotic stress tolerance. Under abiotic stress, RING zinc finger proteins on the plasma membrane may function as sensors or abscisic acid (ABA) receptors in abiotic stress signaling. Some RING zinc finger proteins accumulate in the nucleus may act like transcription factors to regulate the expression of downstream abiotic stress marker genes through direct or indirect ways. Most RING zinc finger proteins usually accumulate in the cytoplasm or nucleus and act as E3 ubiquitin ligases in the abiotic stress response through ABA, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and ethylene signaling pathways. We also highlight areas where further research on RING zinc finger proteins in plants is needed.

Understanding the global abiotic stress response is an important stepping stone for the development of universal stress tolerance in plants in the era of climate change. Although co-occurrence of several stress factors (abiotic and biotic) in nature is found to be frequent, current attempts are poor to understand the complex physiological processes impacting plant growth under combinatory factors. In this review article, we discuss the recent advances of reverse engineering approaches that led to seminal discoveries of key candidate regulatory genes involved in cross-talk of abiotic stress responses and summarized the available tools of reverse engineering and its relevant application. Among the universally induced regulators involved in various abiotic stress responses, we highlight the importance of (i) abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA) hormonal cross-talks and (ii) the central role of WRKY transcription factors (TF), potentially mediating both abiotic and biotic stress responses. Such interactome networks help not only to derive hypotheses but also play a vital role in identifying key regulatory targets and interconnected hormonal responses. To explore the full potential of gene network inference in the area of abiotic stress tolerance, we need to validate hypotheses by implementing time-dependent gene expression data from genetically engineered plants with modulated expression of target genes. We further propose to combine information on gene-by-gene interactions with data from physical interaction platforms such as protein–protein or TF-gene networks.

The recent global climate change has directly impacted major biotic and abiotic stress factors affecting crop productivity worldwide. Therefore, the need of the hour is to develop sustainable multiple stress tolerant crops through modern biotechnological approaches to cope with climate change. Hybrid proline rich proteins (HyPRPs) are the cell-wall structural proteins, which contain an N-terminal repetitive proline-rich domain and a C-terminal conserved eight-cysteine motif domain. HyPRPs are known to regulate multiple abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Recently, a few HyPRPs have been characterized as negative regulators of abiotic and biotic stress responses in different plants. Disruption of such negative regulators for desirable positive phenotypic traits has been made possible through the advent of advanced genome engineering tools. In the past few years, CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as a novel breakthrough technology for crop improvement by target specific editing of known negative regulatory host genes. Here, we have described the mechanism of action and the role of known HyPRPs in regulating different biotic and abiotic stress responses in major crop plants. We have also discussed the importance of the CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing system in targeting known negative regulatory HyPRPs for multi-stress crop tolerance using the tomato crop model. Application of genome editing to manipulate the HyPRPs of major crop plants holds promise in developing newer stress management methods in this rapidly changing climate and would lead in the future to sustain crop productivity.

Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like proteins (LRR-RLPs), a major group of receptor-like proteins in plants, have diverse functions in plant physiology, including growth, development, signal transduction, and stress responses. Despite their importance, the specific roles of kiwifruit LRR-RLPs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses remain poorly understood. In this study, we performed family identification, characterization, transcriptome data analysis, and differential gene expression analysis of kiwifruit LRR-RLPs. We identified totals of 101, 164, and 105 LRR-RLPs in Actinidia chinensis 'Hongyang', Actinidia eriantha 'Huate', and Actinidia chinensis 'Red5', respectively. Synteny analysis revealed that the expansion of kiwifruit LRR-RLPs was primarily attributed to segmental duplication events. Based on RNA-seq data from pathogen-infected kiwifruits, we identified specific LRR-RLP genes potentially involved in different stages of pathogen infection. Additionally, we observed the potential involvement of kiwifruit LRR-RLPs in abiotic stress responses, with upstream transcription factors possibly regulating their expression. Furthermore, protein interaction network analysis unveiled the participation of kiwifruit LRR-RLP in the regulatory network of abiotic stress responses. These findings highlight the crucial roles of LRR-RLPs in mediating both biotic and abiotic stress responses in kiwifruit, offering valuable insights for the breeding of stress-resistant kiwifruit varieties.

The productivity of plants is hindered by unfavorable conditions. To perceive stress signals and to transduce these signals to intracellular responses, plants rely on membrane-bound receptor-like kinases (RLKs). These play a pivotal role in signaling events governing growth, reproduction, hormone perception, and defense responses against biotic stresses; however, their involvement in abiotic stress responses is poorly documented. Plant RLKs harbor an N-terminal extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and a C-terminal intracellular kinase domain. The ectodomains of these RLKs are quite diverse, aiding their responses to various stimuli. We summarize here the sub-classes of RLKs based on their domain structure and discuss the available information on their specific role in abiotic stress adaptation. Furthermore, the current state of knowledge on RLKs and their significance in abiotic stress responses is highlighted in this review, shedding light on their role in influencing plant-environment interactions and opening up possibilities for novel approaches to engineer stress-tolerant crop varieties.

In plants, post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins control all the major cellular processes and pathways by regulating the stability and functional accuracy of the nascent proteins. The importance of PTMs in plant systems can be advocated by a number of studies supporting the role of glycosylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, nitrosylation and sumoylation in providing tolerance to plant systems in adverse environmental conditions by activating/deactivating the pre-existing cellular components. The mechanisms underlying the response of plants to abiotic stress have been extensively explored in the past decades. In addition, to the vast amount of knowledge obtained from the research at genetic and transcriptional level, there is a rapidly growing interest in plant scientists to examine the abiotic stress response of plants at the level of proteins and phosphorylation. In this article, we have summarized and discussed the recent reports implicating the prospects of PTMs in various abiotic stress regulations in plants, particularly highlighting the role of phosphorylation in this point of view. An exhaustive study of plant response to abiotic stress factors at post translational level will contribute to better understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying plant stress response and hence, aid in developing strategies that facilitate the improvement of abiotic stress tolerant crops.

The relative concentrations of ions and solutes inside cells are actively maintained by several classes of transport proteins, in many cases against their concentration gradient. These transport processes, which consume a large portion of cellular energy, must be constantly regulated. Many structurally distinct families of channels, carriers, and pumps have been characterized in considerable detail during the past decades and defects in the function of some of these proteins have been linked to a growing list of human diseases. The dynamic regulation of the transport proteins present at the cell surface is vital for both normal cellular function and for the successful adaptation to changing environments. The composition of proteins present at the cell surface is controlled on both the transcriptional and post-translational level. Post-translational regulation involves highly conserved mechanisms of phosphorylation- and ubiquitylation-dependent signal transduction routes used to modify the cohort of receptors and transport proteins present under any given circumstances. In this review, we will summarize what is currently known about one facet of this regulatory process: the endocytic regulation of alkali metal transport proteins. The physiological relevance, major contributors, parallels and missing pieces of the puzzle in mammals, yeast and plants will be discussed.

Numerous stresses caused by complex environmental conditions, e.g., drought, heat, cold, salinity, strong light, UV, and heavy metals, negatively affect plant growth and lead to substantial crop losses worldwide. It is estimated that up to 50–70% of declines in crop productivity can be attributed to abiotic stress (Mittler, 2006). Abiotic stress, particularly drought and extreme temperatures, will be more frequent and severe in the near future because of global climate change (Horton et al., 2015). Understanding the abiotic stress response in plants has attracted substantial attention within the plant proteomics community. Quantitative proteomic comparisons are particularly useful in defining proteins that change in abundance, form, location, activity, and these comparisons may indicate involvement in responses to alterations in environmental conditions (Thelen and Peck, 2007). Such analyses can detect proteins involved in the mechanisms underlying plant stress resistance to various abiotic stresses. These proteins can potentially serve as molecular markers in marker-assisted selection by possibly speeding up the identification of relevant targets for stress breeding. Considering the 2DE and/or iTRAQ analysis methods of proteomics as an example, we briefly analyzed the methodological defects in detecting stress-responsive proteins in plants and propose our opinions for addressing these defects in future plant stress proteomics. The intended audiences of this opinion paper are novice rather than experienced scientists in the plant proteomics research community.

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) proteins are conserved in higher eukaryotes and play key roles in transducing cellular signals across different organelles. They are characterized by their C-terminal region (TRAF-C domain) containing seven to eight anti-parallel β-sheets, also known as the meprin and TRAF-C homology (MATH) domain. Over the past few decades, significant progress has been made toward understanding the diverse roles of TRAF proteins in mammals and plants. Compared to other eukaryotic species, the Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Oryza sativa) genomes encode many more TRAF/MATH domain-containing proteins; these plant proteins cluster into five classes: TRAF/MATH-only, MATH-BPM, MATH-UBP (ubiquitin protease), Seven in absentia (SINA), and MATH-Filament and MATH-PEARLI-4 proteins, suggesting parallel evolution of TRAF proteins in plants. Increasing evidence now indicates that plant TRAF proteins form central signaling networks essential for multiple biological processes, such as vegetative and reproductive development, autophagosome formation, plant immunity, symbiosis, phytohormone signaling, and abiotic stress responses. Here, we summarize recent advances and highlight future prospects for understanding on the molecular mechanisms by which TRAF proteins act in plant development and stress responses.

Accumulating evidence suggest that certain annexins can play a role in abiotic stress responses in plants. We found that for one member of the Arabidopsis annexin gene family, annexin 1 (AnnAt1), loss-of-function mutants are more sensitive to drought stress and gain-of-function mutants are more tolerant1. We also found that AnnAt1 is able to regulate accumulation of H2O2 in vivo in Arabidopsis cells based on the observation that the level of ROS accumulation following induction by ABA correlates with the level of AnnAt1 protein in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Here we provide more commentary on the antioxidant activity of AnnAt1, critically assess the evidence that AnnAt1 and other annexins possess peroxidase activity, emphasize a redox-induced post-translational modification which occurs to AnnAt1 during ABA signaling, and discuss ways this annexin’s membrane associations could mediate stress signaling while addressing the potential that AnnAt1 is a multifunctional protein in plants.

Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3)/SHAGGY-like Kinase (SK) proteins in plants govern growth, development, and several abiotic and biotic stress responses. GSK3 proteins are cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases that control glycogen metabolism in eukaryotes. However, nothing is known about the discovery and characterization of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) genes in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). In the present study, eight Setaria italica GSK (SiGSKs) genes were identified and divided into four groups based on their phylogenetic affinities with rice and Arabidopsis. The gene structure and motif organizations were examined to delve deeper into SiGSKs function and its evolution. The SiGSKs encode active protein kinases, according to conserved motif and kinase domain analysis. Many growth hormones and stress-responsive elements were found in the SiGSK promoter regions, which is compatible with their expression in diverse organs and their changed expression in response to abiotic stress such as salt, drought, and oxidative damage. qRT-PCR expression analysis of SiGSKs under three different abiotic stresses suggests its role in signaling and regulating the mechanism under the mentioned abiotic stresses. The current research opens up new opportunities for SiGSK functional validation in S. italica (L.) by genetic engineering.

Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) domains have been identified in a wide range of proteins of unrelated functions such as, metabolic enzymes, kinases and channels, and usually occur as tandem re-peats, often in combination with other domains. In plants, CBS Domain-Containing Proteins (CDCPs) form a multi-gene family and only a few are so far been reported to have a role in development via regu-lation of thioredoxin system as well as in abiotic and biotic stress response. However, the function of majority of CDCPs still remains to be elucidated in plants. Here, we report the cloning, characterization and functional validation of a CBS domain containing protein, OsCBSCBSPB4 from rice, which pos-sesses two CBS domains and one PB1 domain. We show that OsCBSCBSPB4 encodes a nucleo-cytoplasmic protein whose expression is induced in response to various abiotic stress conditions in salt-sensitive IR64 and salt-tolerant Pokkali rice cultivars. Further, heterologous expression of OsCBSCB-SPB4 in E. coli and tobacco confers marked tolerance against various abiotic stresses. Transgenic tobac-co seedlings over-expressing OsCBSCBSPB4 were found to exhibit better growth in terms of delayed leaf senescence, profuse root growth and increased biomass in contrast to the wild-type seedlings when subjected to salinity, dehydration, oxidative and extreme temperature treatments. Yeast-two hybrid stud-ies revealed that OsCBSCBSPB4 interacts with various proteins. Of these, some are known to be in-volved in abiotic stress tolerance. Our results suggest that OsCBSCBSPB4 is involved in abiotic stress response and is a potential candidate for raising multiple abiotic stress tolerant plants.

Drought, cold, high-salinity and heat are major abiotic stresses that severely reduce the yield of food crops worldwide. Traditional plant breeding approaches to improve abiotic stress tolerance of crops had limited success due to multigenic nature of stress tolerance. In the last decade, molecular techniques have been used to understand the mechanisms by which plants perceive environmental signals and further their transmission to cellular machinery to activate adaptive responses. This knowledge is critical for the development of rational breeding and transgenic strategies to impart stress tolerance in crops. Studies on physiological and molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance have led to characterisation of a number of genes associated with stress adaptation. Techniques like microarrays have proven to be invaluable in generating a list of stress-related genes. Some of these genes are specific for a particular stress while others are shared between various stresses. Interestingly, a number of genes are shared in abiotic and biotic stress responses. This highlights the complexity of stress response and adaptation in plants. There is a whole cascade of genes involved in abiotic stress tolerance; starting from stress perception to transcriptional activation of downstream genes leading to stress adaptation and tolerance. A number of these genes have been discovered but we still do not have the complete list with all interactions. There is also significant number of genes with unknown functions found to be regulated by abiotic stresses. Understanding the function of these genes and their interaction with other known genes to effect stress adaptation is required.

WRKY proteins are emerging players in plant signaling and have been thoroughly reported to play important roles in plants under biotic stress like pathogen attack. However, recent advances in this field do reveal the enormous significance of these proteins in eliciting responses induced by abiotic stresses. WRKY proteins act as major transcription factors, either as positive or negative regulators. Specific WRKY factors which help in the expression of a cluster of stress-responsive genes are being targeted and genetically modified to induce improved abiotic stress tolerance in plants. The knowledge regarding the signaling cascade leading to the activation of the WRKY proteins, their interaction with other proteins of the signaling pathway, and the downstream genes activated by them are altogether vital for justified targeting of the WRKY genes. WRKY proteins have also been considered to generate tolerance against multiple abiotic stresses with possible roles in mediating a cross talk between abiotic and biotic stress responses. In this review, we have reckoned the diverse signaling pattern and biological functions of WRKY proteins throughout the plant kingdom along with the growing prospects in this field of research.