Abstract

BackgroundVitamin D deficiency has been associated with multiple diseases, but the causal relevance and underlying processes are not fully understood. Elucidating the mechanisms of action of drug treatments in humans is challenging, but application of functional genomic approaches in randomized trials may afford an opportunity to systematically assess molecular responses. MethodsIn the Biochemical Efficacy and Safety Trial of Vitamin D (BEST-D), a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, randomized clinical trial, 305 community-dwelling individuals aged over 65 years were randomly allocated to treatment with vitamin D3 4000 IU, 2000 IU or placebo daily for 12 months. Genome-wide genotypes at baseline, and transcriptome and plasma levels of cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6 and TNF-α) at baseline and after 12 months, were measured. The trial had >90% power to detect 1.2-fold changes in gene expression. FindingsAllocation to vitamin D for 12-months was associated with 2-fold higher plasma levels of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]D, 4000 IU regimen), but had no significant effect on whole-blood gene expression (FDR < 5%) or on plasma levels of cytokines compared with placebo. In pre-specified analysis, rs7041 (intron variant, GC) had a significant effect on circulating levels of 25(OH)D in the low dose, but not in the placebo or high dose vitamin D regimen. A gene expression quantitative trait locus analysis (eQTL) demonstrated evidence of 31,568 cis-eQTLs (unique SNP-probe pairs) among individuals at baseline and 34,254 after supplementation for 12 months (any dose). No significant associations involving vitamin D supplementation response eQTLs were found. InterpretationWe performed a comprehensive functional genomics and molecular analysis of vitamin D supplementation in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Although this study was limited to mostly Caucasian individuals aged over 65 years, the results differ from many previous studies and do not support a strong effect of vitamin D on long-term transcriptomic changes in blood or on plasma cytokine levels. The trial demonstrates the feasibility of applying functional genomic and genetic approaches in randomized trials to assess molecular and individual level responses. Key ResultSupplementation with high-dose vitamin D in older people for 12 months in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial had no significant effect on gene expression or on plasma concentrations of selected cytokines. Trial RegistrationSRCTN registry (Number 07034656) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT Number 2011-005763-24).

Highlights

  • Randomized controlled trials afford reliable approaches to understand the causal relevance of drug treatments and can help our understanding of disease mechanisms by relating changes in biomarkersA.J

  • We found that 375 probes and 329 probes were significantly differentially expressed following vitamin D supplementation, but none remained significant after taking account of multiple comparisons (FDR b 5%) (Supplementary Table 1)

  • We demonstrated no significant effect of supplementation with either 2000 IU or 4000 IU of vitamin D on genomewide gene expression or on plasma levels of IFN-γ, interleukin 10 (IL-10), interleukin 8 (IL-8), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and TNF-α after one year of supplementation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Randomized controlled trials afford reliable approaches to understand the causal relevance of drug treatments and can help our understanding of disease mechanisms by relating changes in biomarkersA.J. There is an urgent need to demonstrate the value of combining functional genomic approaches, including genome-wide genotyping and gene expression profiling, together with measurements of biochemical and clinical markers in clinical trials to enhance our understanding of the pathophysiological processes and mechanisms of action of novel drug treatments. Such approaches may allow high-throughput assessment of cellular and molecular responses at group and individual levels that can be integrated with effects on clinical outcomes data. Trial Registration: SRCTN registry (Number 07034656) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT Number 2011-005763-24)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.