Abstract

One of the causes of observed low fertility is embryo loss after fertilization. Previous findings suggested that more than half of fertilizations result in embryo loss before pregnancy is detected. We proposed reinsemination between 49 and 100 d after the first insemination as an indicator trait for early abortion (EA) in dairy cattle based on the mean estrus interval of 21 d. This trait was compared with conception rate from first insemination and conception status, computed as the inverse of the number of inseminations to conception. Animal model variance components were estimated by REML, including parents and grandparents of cows with records. First-parity heritability for first insemination conception rate was 3%. In the multitrait analysis of parities 1 to 3 for putative EA, heritabilities ranged from 8.9% for first parity to 10.4% for second parity. All genetic correlations were >0.9, whereas all environmental correlations were <0.12. The variance component for the service sire effect for putative EA rate was less than half the variance component for conception rate. Thus, genetic control of the 2 traits is clearly different, and analysis of EA rate by a single-trait animal model is justified. Genetic evaluation for putative EA was computed using this model, including all first- through third-parity cows with freshening dates from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2016, that either became pregnant on first insemination or were reinseminated between 49 and 100 d after the first insemination. All known parents and grandparents of cows with records were included in the analysis. The regression of the breeding value for non-abortion rate on the cows' birth year was 0.083%/yr. The genetic correlation between first-parity EA and conception status was 0.995. The genetic correlations between first-parity EA and milk, fat, and protein production were all negative, whereas the genetic correlation between EA and herd life was 0.33. Inclusion of putative EA in the selection index instead of conception status resulted in 10 to 20% greater genetic gain for both fertility traits. In a genome-wide association study based on 1,200 dairy bulls with reliabilities >50% for abortion rate genotyped for 41,000 markers, 6 markers were found with nominal probabilities of <10-12 to reject the null hypothesis of no effect on EA rate. The markers with the lowest probabilities for EA rate were also included among the markers with the lowest probabilities for female fertility, but not vice versa. The marker explaining the most variance for abortion rate is located within the ABCA9 gene, which is found within an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) genes cluster. The ABC family is the major class of primary active transporters in the placenta.

Highlights

  • Like almost all economic traits in dairy cattle, genetic evaluation of fertility is based on field records

  • Since genotyping of large numbers of animals with high-density SNP chips has become routine, several recessive lethal alleles have been detected in commercial dairy cattle populations that result in early-term abortions (Cole et al, 2016)

  • Despite the fact that genetic factors that reduce the ability of an individual to reproduce are expected to be under intensive negative selection, reduced fertility is a common health condition in humans and an important economic trait in dairy cattle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Like almost all economic traits in dairy cattle, genetic evaluation of fertility is based on field records. Previous studies in other populations estimated fertilization rate as greater than 75%, whereas the conception rate was approximately 35% (Santos et al, 2004) The differences between these 2 observations are likely due to pregnancy loss that occurs in approximately 50% of effective inseminations. Despite these 2 prominent peaks, a significant number of cows were reinseminated at >45 d after the first insemination (Greenham et al, 2019) These late inseminations may be due to non-conception at the first insemination and lack of observed estrus at the expected interval; another explanation is conception at the first insemination and early-term abortion due to embryonic lethality or female factors increasing the predisposition for embryonic death. One way to test this hypothesis is to demonstrate that the genetic factors that control long intervals between first and second inseminations are different from the genetic factors that control conception and to evaluate the genetic contributions of the cow and the service sire

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.