Abstract

Intracellular parasites of the genus Eimeria are described as tissue/host‐specific. Phylogenetic classification of rodent Eimeria suggested that some species have a broader host range than previously assumed. We explore whether Eimeria spp. infecting house mice are misclassified by the most widely used molecular markers due to a lack of resolution, or whether, instead, these parasite species are indeed infecting multiple host species.With the commonly used markers (18S/COI), we recovered monophyletic clades of E. falciformis and E. vermiformis from Mus that included E. apionodes identified in other rodent host species (Apodemus spp., Myodes glareolus, and Microtus arvalis). A lack of internal resolution in these clades could suggest the existence of a species complex with a wide host range infecting murid and cricetid rodents. We question, however, the power of COI and 18S markers to provide adequate resolution for assessing host specificity. In addition to the rarely used marker ORF470 from the apicoplast genome, we present multilocus genotyping as an alternative approach. Phylogenetic analysis of 35 nuclear markers differentiated E. falciformis from house mice from isolates from Apodemus hosts. Isolates of E. vermiformis from Mus are still found in clusters interspersed with non‐Mus isolates, even with this high‐resolution data.In conclusion, we show that species‐level resolution should not be assumed for COI and 18S markers in coccidia. Host–parasite cospeciation at shallow phylogenetic nodes, as well as contemporary coccidian host ranges more generally, is still open questions that need to be addressed using novel genetic markers with higher resolution.

Highlights

  • Coccidians of the genus Eimeria have been described as monoxenous, intracellular parasites (Becker, 1934; Long & Joyner, 1984; Marquardt, 1981)

  • We studied whether coccidia with different host usage can be distinguished with currently used molecular markers, using the example of Eimeria species in house mice and related rodents

  • We found that commonly used phylogenetic markers, nu 18S rDNA and mt c oxidase I (COI), are not sufficiently variable to differentiate parasite isolates that would be regarded as separate species based on host usage

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Coccidians of the genus Eimeria have been described as monoxenous, intracellular parasites (Becker, 1934; Long & Joyner, 1984; Marquardt, 1981). Two different characteristics extensively used to delineate Eimeria species are their assumed high degree of host and tissue specificity. A high specificity of E. apionodes naturally infecting Apodemus flavicollis was originally suggested based on failed attempts to experimentally infect other rodents: Myodes (Clethrionomys) glareolus, Microtus arvalis, or Mus musculus (Pellérdy, 1954). It is, unclear if this result holds for the multiple isolates that have been assigned as E. apionodes. We develop and apply multilocus sequence typing to disentangle relationships unresolved by 18S and COI markers

| MATERIAL AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.