Gender-specific relationships between hearing loss, its rehabilitation, and quality of life in middle-aged and older adults
Backgrounds Hearing loss (HL) is associated with various functional deficits. Aims/Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of patients with HL according to their gender. Materials and Methods Participants aged 40 or older from the 8th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2019–2021) with data on otologic evaluations and the Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument with 8 Items (HINT-8) were included. They were classified into the bilateral hearing, unilateral hearing, or disabling HL groups based on moderate HL (> 40 dB) in each ear. Results Among males, the disabling HL group scored significantly worse in climbing stairs, vitality, working, and depression compared to both the bilateral and unilateral hearing groups (p < 0.05 for all), and reported significantly lower happiness than the bilateral hearing group (p = 0.041). Furthermore, hearing aid users had significantly higher vitality than non-users (p = 0.009). In females, only vitality was significantly worse in the disabling HL group (p = 0.019). Conclusions and Significance Republic of Korea Male patients with disabling HL experienced a greater decline in QOL and hearing aids might be associated with preserving vitality in males. Further research is required to elucidate greater vulnerability to HL in males.
66
- 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.08.003
- Aug 9, 2017
- Social Science Research
23
- 10.1186/s12955-021-01864-z
- Oct 2, 2021
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
2
- 10.1038/s41598-024-57927-w
- Mar 29, 2024
- Scientific Reports
- 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e3
- Jan 1, 2025
- Journal of Korean medical science
- 10.1002/lary.31638
- Jul 17, 2024
- The Laryngoscope
230
- 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.09.004
- Sep 11, 2019
- Maturitas
233
- 10.14336/ad.2014.0128
- Feb 9, 2014
- Aging and disease
56
- 10.1097/mao.0000000000002507
- Mar 1, 2020
- Otology & Neurotology
146
- 10.1097/aud.0000000000000041
- Jul 1, 2014
- Ear & Hearing
24
- 10.3109/03005367909078882
- Jan 1, 1979
- British Journal of Audiology
- Research Article
6
- 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2399
- Sep 1, 2022
- JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Hearing loss is associated with higher hospitalization risk among older adults. However, evidence on whether hearing aid use is associated with fewer hospitalizations among individuals with hearing loss remains limited. To assess the association between audiometric hearing loss severity and hearing aid use and hospitalization. This population-based cross-sectional study used audiometric and health care utilization data for respondents aged 65 years or older from 4 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005 to 2016. Data were analyzed from February 23, 2021, to March 22, 2022. Audiometric hearing loss severity and participant-reported hearing aid use. The main outcome was respondent-reported hospitalization in the past 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association of hearing loss severity with hospitalization. To assess the association of hearing aid use with hospitalization, propensity score matching was performed with 2:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement. Of 2060 respondents (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [5.9] years; 1045 [50.7%] male), 875 (42.5%) had normal hearing, 653 (31.7%) had mild hearing loss, 435 (21.1%) had moderate hearing loss, and 97 (4.7%) had severe to profound hearing loss. On multivariable analysis, moderate and severe hearing loss were associated with hospitalization (moderate hearing loss: odds ratio [OR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.01-2.24; severe hearing loss: OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.03-2.84). Of 1185 respondents with at least mild hearing loss, 200 (16.9%) reported using a hearing aid. Propensity score-matched analysis showed that hearing aid use was not associated with hospitalization (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.74-1.84), including among respondents with moderate or severe hearing loss (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.71-1.92). In this cross-sectional study, hearing loss was associated with higher risk of hospitalization, but hearing aid use was not associated with a reduction in hospitalization risk in the population with hearing loss. The association of hearing aid use with hospitalization should be evaluated in larger prospective studies with reliable data on the frequency of hearing aid use.
- Research Article
761
- 10.1093/gerona/glr002
- Feb 27, 2011
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Hearing loss has been associated with cognitive and functional decline in older adults and may be amenable to rehabilitative interventions, but national estimates of hearing loss prevalence and hearing aid use in older adults are unavailable. We analyzed data from the 2005-2006 cycle of the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, which is the first cycle to ever incorporate hearing assessment in adults aged 70 years and older. Audiometry was performed in 717 older adults, and data on hearing aid use, noise exposure, medical history, and demographics were obtained from interviews. Analyses incorporated sampling weights to account for the complex sampling design and yield results that are generalizable to the U.S. population. The prevalence of hearing loss defined as a speech frequency pure tone average of more than 25 dB in the better ear was 63.1% (95% confidence interval: 57.4-68.8). Age, sex, and race were the factors most strongly associated with hearing loss after multivariate adjustment, with black race being substantially protective against hearing loss (odds ratio 0.32 compared with white participants [95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.53]). Hearing aids were used in 40.0% (95% confidence interval: 35.1-44.8) of adults with moderate hearing loss, but in only 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 0.8-6.0) of those with a mild hearing loss. Hearing loss is prevalent in nearly two thirds of adults aged 70 years and older in the U.S. population. Additional research is needed to determine the epidemiological and physiological basis for the protective effect of black race against hearing loss and to determine the role of hearing aids in those with a mild hearing loss.
- Research Article
- 10.1002/lary.31638
- Jul 17, 2024
- The Laryngoscope
Hearing loss causes numerous functional deficits. However, few studies have been conducted to assess the association between hearing loss and physical inactivity. This study aimed to evaluate the physical activity and sedentary behavior of hearing loss patients and their relation with the use of hearing aids. We extracted participants over 60 years of age with information on hearing status and physical activities from the eighth Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey conducted from 2019 to 2020. We classified them into four groups: a normal hearing group (≤25 dB), a mild hearing loss group (>25 dB and ≤40 dB), a moderate hearing loss group (>40 dB and ≤50 dB), and a non-serviceable hearing group (>50 dB). Additionally, we extracted hearing aid users with hearing levels exceeding 50 dB. After adjusting other factors, the non-serviceable hearing group walked less frequently than the moderate (p = 0.004) and mild hearing loss group (p < 0.001) and walked less and sat more than the normal hearing group (walking frequency: p < 0.001; walking time: p = 0.020; and sitting time: p = 0.034). Also, the hearing aid users walked more frequently (p = 0.003) and for longer (p = 0.045) than the non-serviceable hearing group. Hearing loss is associated with reduced walking and a sedentary lifestyle. The use of hearing aids is associated with improved physical activity. Appropriate interventions, including hearing aids, should be provided to hearing loss patients. 3 (individual cross-sectional study) Laryngoscope, 134:5109-5115, 2024.
- Research Article
4
- 10.1044/leader.ftr4.17022012.5
- Feb 1, 2012
- The ASHA Leader
The American Hearing Loss Epidemic: Few of 46 Million With Hearing Loss Seek Treatment
- Research Article
- 10.1097/01.hj.0000557748.20529.b3
- Apr 1, 2019
- The Hearing Journal
Hearing Loss and Depression in the Hispanic/Latino Population
- Research Article
17
- 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00232-5
- Jan 1, 2024
- The lancet. Healthy longevity
Association between hearing aid use and mortality in adults with hearing loss in the USA: a mortality follow-up study of a cross-sectional cohort
- Research Article
18
- 10.1016/j.anl.2021.03.017
- Apr 15, 2021
- Auris Nasus Larynx
Prevalence of usage of hearing aids and its association with cognitive impairment in Japanese community-dwelling elders with hearing loss
- Research Article
- 10.1097/01.hj.0000695860.82287.ba
- Aug 1, 2020
- The Hearing Journal
Hearing Aid Use, Satisfaction in Older Adults: Will Physician Visits Make a Difference?
- Research Article
- 10.1097/01.hj.0000755504.48370.53
- May 28, 2021
- The Hearing Journal
Factors and Communication Impact of Unilateral Hearing Loss in U.S. Adults
- Research Article
2
- 10.1177/0194599814541629a277
- Sep 1, 2014
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Objectives:Although hearing impairment is prevalent in older adults and may carry implications for cognitive, social, and physical functioning, little is known about hearing care among older minority adults. The aims of this study were: (1) describe factors that are associated with disparities in hearing health care among older adults and (2) assess the current reach of hearing care delivery to older adults.Methods:We analyzed nationally‐representative, cross‐sectional data from 1544 older adults ≥70 years with audiometry and hearing health care data from the 2005‐2006, 2009‐2010 National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys. The 2 primary outcomes were recent hearing screening (≤4 years) and, for those with hearing loss, regular hearing aid use (≥5 h/wk in the past 12 months). Disparities‐related covariates included demographics, insurance status, general health, and health care utilization.Results:Adjusting for age and better ear speech‐frequency (0.5‐4 kHz), pure tone average (PTA), race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21‐2.33, Blacks compared with Whites) and education (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.05‐2.52 ≥college versus <high school), were associated with having a recent hearing screening. However, hearing aid use was associated with socioeconomic status (higher education, income, poverty‐to‐income ratios, having private insurance), and with race (Blacks OR = 0.42 [95% CI: 0.19‐0.91] and Mexican Americans OR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.06‐0.74] versus Whites). In a multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, hearing loss, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, Blacks were not more likely than Whites to use hearing aids despite higher levels of hearing screening (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.28‐1.93).Conclusions:With increasing populations of older minority adults and growing evidence of the detrimental effects of hearing loss, disparities in hearing health care represent critical areas for research and intervention.
- Research Article
- 10.1097/01.hj.0000800732.44356.2b
- Oct 28, 2021
- The Hearing Journal
Brain Correlates of Verbal Working Memory in Children with Hearing Loss: Auditory Experience Matters
- Research Article
3
- 10.1097/01.hj.0000856020.46654.ec
- Jul 28, 2022
- The Hearing Journal
How to Improve Audiology Services: The Patient Perspective
- Research Article
41
- 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00005
- Jan 24, 2019
- Frontiers in Public Health
The number of older adults with vision and/or hearing loss is growing world-wide, including in China, whose population is aging rapidly. Sensory loss impacts on older people's ability to participate in their communities and their quality of life. This study investigates the prevalence of vision loss, hearing loss, and dual sensory loss (combined vision and hearing loss) in an older adult Chinese population and describes the relationships between these sensory losses and demographic factors, use of glasses and hearing aids, unmet needs, and impacts on social participation. The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study is a population-based longitudinal survey conducted since 2011. The 2013 dataset for people aged 60 and over was used in this study. Items analyzed included demographic data (age, gender, education, rurality, and SES), self-reported ratings of vision (including legally blind, excellent-poor long, and short distance vision and the use and frequency of wearing glasses), hearing (excellent-poor hearing and the use of hearing aids), dual sensory loss (both poor/fair vision and hearing), and social participation. Of the sample, 80.2% reported poor/fair vision, 64.9% reported poor/fair hearing, and 57.2% had poor/fair vision and hearing. Few respondents (10%) wore glasses regularly and 20.1% wore glasses from time to time. Only 0.8% of respondents wore hearing aids although the proportion with hearing loss was high (64.9%). The proportion of unmet needs for glasses and hearing aids was 54.9 and 63.9%, respectively. Low socio-economic status (SES), poor education, and rurality were significantly associated with the prevalence of poor/fair vision and hearing, the use of glasses and hearing aids and the unmet needs of glasses/hearing aids. Poor/fair vision and/or hearing, and the unmet needs for glasses/hearing aids were significantly and negatively associated with social participation. Sensory loss is a significant health issue for older Chinese people that impacts on their social participation. Training primary care health professionals in identification and rehabilitation approaches is needed as well as increasing the numbers of vision and hearing specialists working in the field. Providing information on sensory loss and the use of aids to older adults will also help improve older adult's quality of life.
- Research Article
- 10.1097/01.hj.0000529842.91837.39
- Jan 1, 2018
- The Hearing Journal
Hearing Loss and Ethnicity in Age-related Cognitive Decline
- Research Article
5
- 10.3389/fnins.2023.1327759
- Jan 8, 2024
- Frontiers in neuroscience
To evaluate the associations between hearing status and hearing aid use and performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older adults in a cross-sectional study in Norway. This study utilized data from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4, 2017-2019). Hearing thresholds at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (or PTA4) in the better hearing ear were used to determine participants' hearing status [normal hearing (PTA4 hearing threshold, ≤ 15 dB), or slight (PTA4, 16-25 dB), mild (PTA4, 26-40 dB), moderate (PTA4, 41-55 dB), or severe (PTA4, ≥ 56 dB) hearing loss]. Both standard scoring and alternate MoCA scoring for people with hearing loss (deleting MoCA items that rely on auditory function) were used in data analysis. The analysis was adjusted for the confounders age, sex, education, and health covariates. The pattern of results for the alternate scoring was similar to that for standard scoring. Compared with the normal-hearing group, only individuals with moderate or severe hearing loss performed worse in the MoCA. In addition, people with slight hearing loss performed better in the MoCA than those with moderate or severe hearing loss. Within the hearing loss group, hearing aid use was associated with better performance in the MoCA. No interaction was observed between hearing aid use and participants' hearing status with performance on the MoCA test. While hearing loss was associated with poorer performance in the MoCA, hearing aid use was found to be associated with better performance in the MoCA. Future randomized control trials are needed to further examine the efficacy of hearing aid use on the MoCA performance. When compared with standard scoring, the alternate MoCA scoring had no effect on the pattern of results.
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2577829
- Nov 1, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Front Matter
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2573820
- Oct 29, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2579141
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2577834
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2563035
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2577832
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2577154
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2575865
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2575851
- Oct 28, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Research Article
- 10.1080/00016489.2025.2559881
- Oct 25, 2025
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.