Abstract

The self-construal literature suggests that there is a gender difference in interdependence, with women placing more value on relational groups and men placing more value on collective groups. However, the evidence for such differences is inconsistent. We hypothesized that gender differences are due to differential cognitive representations of groups rather than differential value placed on those groups. In three studies we found that women were more likely than men to think of their groups as dyadic bonds, whereas men were more likely than women to think of their groups as categorical affiliations. Additionally, men's cognitive representations tended to be categorical regardless of the type of group, whereas women's representations tended to match the type of group. We discuss how gender socialization may teach differential cognitive representations of the same social groups.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.