Abstract

IntroductionSexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. The objective of this study was to determine if there were gender differences in adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) STI diagnosis and treatment guidelines, as documented by emergency providers.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients treated for urethritis, cervicitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in the EDs of three hospitals in a Pennsylvania network during a calendar year. Cases were reviewed to assess for compliance with CDC guidelines. We used descriptive statistics to assess the distributions of study variables by patient sex. In the analysis we used Student’s t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.ResultsWe identified 286 patient records. Of these, we excluded 39 for the following reasons: incorrect disease coding; the patient was admitted and treated as an inpatient for his/her disease; or the patient left the ED after refusing care. Of the 247 participants, 159 (64.4%) were female. Females were significantly younger (26.6 years, SD=8.0) than males (31.2, SD=11.5%), (95% confidence interval [CI] [2.0– 7.0], p=0.0003). All of the males (n=88) in the cohort presented with urethritis; 25.8% of females presented with cervicitis, and 74.2% with PID. Physician compliance for the five CDC criteria ranged from 68.8% for patient history to 93.5% for patient diagnostic testing, including urine pregnancy and gonorrhea/chlamydia cultures. We observed significant differences by patient sex. Fifty-four percent of the charts had symptoms recorded for female patients that were consistent with CDC characteristics for diagnostic criteria compared to over 95% for males, OR=16.9; 95% CI [5.9–48.4], p<0.001. Similar results were observed for patient discharge instructions, with physicians completely documenting delivery of discharge instructions to 51.6% of females compared to 97.7% of complete documentation in males, OR=42.3; 95% CI [10.0–178.6] p<0.001). We observed no significant sex differences in physician documentation for physical exam or for therapeutic antibiotic treatment.ConclusionThis retrospective study found patient gender differences in how emergency providers complied with documenting with regard to the 2010 CDC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of urethritis, cervicitis, and PID. Specifically medical records of men were more likely to have complete documentation of symptoms recorded (95% CI 5.9–48.4) and to have discharge instruction documentation (95% CI 10.0–178.6) than records of women.

Highlights

  • Transmitted infections (STIs) are a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits

  • All of the males (n=88) in the cohort presented with urethritis; 25.8% of females presented with cervicitis, and 74.2% with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)

  • Fifty-four percent of the charts had symptoms recorded for female patients that were consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) characteristics for diagnostic criteria compared to over 95% for males, odds ratio (OR)=16.9; 95% CI [5.9-48.4], p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine if there were gender differences in adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) STI diagnosis and treatment guidelines, as documented by emergency providers. Control and Prevention (CDC), the rate of infection of sexually transmitted diseases (STIs) is rising; as compared to 2013, the rates of infection of chlamydia and gonorrhea increased by 2.8% and 5.1%, respectively in 2014.1 This amounted to over 1.4 million cases of chlamydia and over 350,000 cases of gonorrhea reported in 2014.1 STIs are a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. While “sex” is the preferred term in basic science research, in this manuscript we have used the terms male/female or “gender” – referring to the socially constructed biological roles of an individual based on their XX or XY status, as it is more commonly used by clinicians

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.