Abstract
This work focuses on comparing gas source localization accuracy of three types of gas source localization methods which are the conventional method, weighted-averaging mean method and variance map from DM+V method. Gas source localization accuracy in this work means the distance error between the calculated source location and the actual source location. All methods were implemented offline using the measurements collected from real-time gas source localization experiments that were done beforehand. The dataset consists of gas sensor measurements, and mobile robot’s location in a 3m by 6m test area. The goal of the work is to shine a light on why recent works in the field are more focusing on improving probabilistic and map-based algorithms. This work also shows how the kernel size of kernel-based gas distribution mapping might affect the gas source localization accuracy in a small indoor area.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
