Abstract
The purpose of this note is to correct an error in Theorem 3.4 of Anderson (1987) whose notation and assumptions we adopt. That theorem, while fairly technical in its statement, plays a significant role in Anderson (1986, 1988), Geller (1987) and Kim (1986). The error occurs in the last line of the last full paragraph of page 9, where it is asserted that ii(a) Eg(a) for all UES u {a i,. . .,a,). In fact, it only follows that &a)~cong(a). When this is taken into account, a constant in the statement of Theorem 3.4 must be multiplied by a factor of ,/%
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
