Ganglionated plexus ablation for refractory vasovagal syncope: Moving from "promising" to "protocolized".

Ganglionated plexus ablation of the left atrium for refractory vasovagal syncope: Analysis of the Safety, Effectiveness and Related Factors.

Left Atrial Ganglion Ablation as an Adjunct to Atrial Fibrillation Surgery in Valvular Heart Disease

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The effect of different anesthetics on the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) is not well known. As a relatively new treatment option, ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation aims to modify the behavior of the cardiac ANS to prevent some/all of the autonomic processes occurring in vasovagal syncope (VVS) by using endocardial ablation techniques. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the effects midazolam and propofol on the vagal response (VR) characteristics during GP ablation in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Methods Forty consecutive patients undergoing GP ablation for VVS were divided to receive local anesthesia with midazolam (group 1, n = 29) or general anesthesia with propofol (group EA, n = 11). All GP sites were detected by using previously defined fragmented electrogram based strategy. VR was defined on 3 levels: 1) R-R interval increased by 50% (level 1); 2) R-R interval increased by 20-50% (level 2); and 3) R-R interval increase lower than 20% (level 3). Results Baseline characteristics and mean follow-up times were comparable between groups. In both groups, the left superior GP (LSGP) was the most common GP site at which a VR was observed. However, there was a significant difference between groups for level of VR. While ablation on the LSGP caused a level 1 VR in 89.6% of cases in group 1, level 1 VR was seen in 22.2% of cases in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Similarly, ratio of level 1 VR during ablation on the left inferior GP (LIGP) was significantly lower in group 2 (44.8% vs 9%, p = 0.034). Once cut-off for VR was decreased to level 2, the ratio of (+) VR increased to 90.9% during ablation on the LSGP in group 2. Level 2 VR was detected in 45.4% of cases during ablation on the LIGP. Ratio of positive VRs in any level was lower than 20% during ablation on the right superior and inferior GPs in both groups. During a mean follow-up time of 12.1 ± 7 months, all but 2 (5%) of 40 patients were free of syncope. Conclusions The autonomic nervous tone might be affected in different ways by local and general anesthesia. Propofol may reveal a shift in the sympathovagal balance toward sympathetic predominance which may cause a blunting on VR during GP ablation. Further randomized, controlled and multicenter studies should be performed to confirm these findings.

We aimed to determine the effects of conscious and deep sedation on vagal response (VR) characteristics during ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation. Forty consecutive patients undergoing GP ablation for vasovagal syncope were divided to receive conscious sedation with midazolam (Group 1, n = 29) or deep sedation with the midazolam-propofol combination (Group 2, n = 11). VR was defined on three levels. R-R interval increase of >50% (Level 1); R-R interval increase of 20%-50% (Level 2); and R-R interval increase of <20% (Level 3). The ratio of Level 1 VR during ablation on left superior and inferior GPs was significantly lower in Group 2 (p < .0001 and p = .034, respectively). Once the cut-off for VR was decreased to Level 2, the ratio of (+) VR was similar between groups during ablation of left-sided GPs. Positive VR in any level was lower than 20% during ablation of right-sided GPs. The autonomic tone might be affected in different ways by the level or type of intravenous sedation. Awareness of anesthesia-related differences may be important if GP ablation will be performed by using VR characteristics during ablation.

Adjunctive ganglionic plexus (GP) ablation may increase the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Prior meta-analyses examining PVI with adjunctive GP ablation have included non-randomized trials and have included trials evaluating thorascopic epicardial ablation. The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endocardial catheter-based PVI to PVI with adjunctive GP ablation. Summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 values. Sub-group analysis was performed comparing arrhythmia recurrence between patients with paroxysmal versus persistent AF at trial baseline. Meta-regressions were performed with mean left atrial diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction at trial baseline as the moderator variables. Five RCTs were identified including 814 patients: 406 PVI + GP ablation and 408 PVI alone. The mean age of participants was 56.5years and 74.7% were male. Four of these trials evaluated catheter-based endocardial ablation for a total of 574 patients: 289 PVI + GP ablation and 285 PVI alone. The odds of arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing adjunctive GP ablation with PVI compared with PVI alone were a reduced: odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.82, I2 = 40.2%. In the subgroup analysis, the odds of arrhythmia recurrence with adjunctive GP ablation were reduced in those with paroxysmal AF (OR 0.396, 95% CI 0.23-0.69, I2 = 0%). A non-significant trend to reduced arrhythmia recurrence was also observed in those with persistent AF (OR 0.726, 95% CI 0.475-1.112, I2 = 0%). When performing the meta-regression, increased left atrial diameter was associated with decreased treatment effect of adjunctive GP ablation (R2 index = 1.0, I2 = 0%). The addition of GP ablation to PVI was associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence. Adjunctive GP ablation was more effective in paroxysmal AF and in patients with smaller atria. Larger RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of GP + PVI ablation.

Additional Ganglion Plexus Ablation During Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation of Advanced Atrial Fibrillation: Intermediate Follow-Up of the AFACT Study.

Ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation may be associated with improved syncope or arrhythmia-free survival arrhythmia patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS) and atrial fibrillation (AF), respectively. We aimed to compare the characteristics of vagal response (VR) and clarify the effect on heart rate after GP ablation based on clinical diagnosis. A total of 83 consecutive patients undergoing GP ablation were divided following two groups: (1) GP ablation for VVS (VVS group, n = 43) and (2) GP ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (AF group, n = 40). We examined VR characteristics during RF ablation and high frequency stimulation, respectively, in the VVS and AF groups. To evaluate immediate and long-term heart rate response, a standard 12-lead ECG was obtained at baseline at 24h after ablation and at the last follow-up visit. In the VVS group, the superior and inferior left atrial GPs were the most common GP sites at which a VR was observed. No VR was seen during radiofrequency application in the superior and inferior right atrial GPs in the VVS group. On the contrary, VR was more prevalent in the right-sided GPs during high-frequency stimulation in the AF group. VR was observed during ablation in only one patient with AF. Although the heart rate increased significantly after ablation in both groups, the effect was more prominent and durable in the VVS group. The autonomic response during GP ablation is different in VVS compared to AF, suggesting that VVS and AF may represent distinct forms of autonomic hyperactivity.

BackgroundAutonomic modification through catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) in the left atrium has been reported previously as a treatment for vasovagal syncope. This study aimed to observe the long‐term outcome in a larger cohort.Methods and ResultsA total of 57 consecutive patients (aged 43.2±13.4 years; 35 women) with refractory vasovagal syncope were enrolled, and high‐frequency stimulation and anatomically guided GP ablation were performed in 10 and 47 cases, respectively. A total of 127 GP sites with positive vagal response were successfully elicited and ablated, including 52 left superior, 19 left lateral, 18 left inferior, 27 right anterior, and 11 right inferior GPs. During follow‐up of 36.4±22.2 months (range 12–102 months), 52 patients (91.2%) remained free from syncope. Prodromes recurred in 16 patients. No statistical differences were found between the high‐frequency stimulation and anatomically guided ablation groups in either freedom from syncope (100% versus 89.4%, P=0.348) or recurrent prodromes (50% versus 76.6%, P=0.167). The deceleration capacity, heart rate, and heart rate variability measurements demonstrated a reduced vagal tone lasting for at least 12 months after the procedure, with improved tolerance of repeated head‐up tilt testing. No complications were observed except for transient sinus tachycardia that occurred in 1 patient.ConclusionsLeft atrial GP ablation showed excellent long‐term clinical outcomes and might be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic vasovagal syncope.

This study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of selective cardiac autonomic ganglion plexus (GP) ablation on patients with bradyarrhythmia. The heart is controlled by its own intrinsic and central autonomic nerves. Increased cardiac vagal tone leads to sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular conduction disorders, resulting in bradyarrhythmia. Pacemaker implantation can relieve the symptoms of arrhythmia caused by bradycardia, but it is not easy for patients to accept a pacemaker implantation as a form of treatment. Therefore, more and more attention has been paid to cardiac vagus nerve ablation. In this study, 20 patients who met the inclusion criteria of GP ablation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from November 2019 to June 2020 were enrolled. Biochemical and other related examinations along with electrophysiological examinations were conducted before ablation, and then cardiac GP ablation was performed. The patients were followed up 3 times at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation. The minimum HR and mean HR were significantly increased after treatment with cardiac autonomic GP ablation (p<0.01). Moreover, the SDNN (Standard deviation of Normal-to-Normal Intervals) and RMSSD (Root mean square successive differences between successive R-R intervals) was significantly decreased after treatment with cardiac autonomic ganglion plexus ablation for 6 months and 12 months (p<0.01). Cardiac GP ablation is relatively simple and easy to implement in units that have performed radiofrequency ablation for bradyarrhythmias. This procedure can be performed without any new equipment. Some patients with bradycardia may not have a permanent pacemaker implantation and may go in for additional treatment options.

Ganglion Plexus Ablation in Advanced Atrial Fibrillation: The AFACT Study

Cardioneuroablation in patients with vasovagal syncope: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AB-453070-1 NOVEL INSIGHTS OF GANGLIONATED PLEXI ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: FINDINGS FROM RECURRENCE CASES

Effect of ganglionated plexi ablation by high-density mapping on long-term suppression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation – The first clinical survey on ablation of the dorsal right plexusus

Cardiac deceleration capacity as an indicator for cardioneuroablation in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope.

Case: A 75-year-old woman was referred for recurrent syncope. Over the past 12 months, she had had 10 episodes of brief (less than 1 minute) loss of consciousness with rapid recovery. She has known coronary artery disease and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting 2 years ago. She had diabetes mellitus that was well controlled with insulin. Her physical examination was normal, including orthostatic blood pressures. She has been admitted several times to different hospitals for the evaluation of recurrent syncope. Electrocardiograms have shown left bundle-branch block. Holter monitoring, electroencephalograms, and head computed tomography scans have been negative. Neurology consult believed that there was not a neurological cause for her loss of consciousness. A thallium stress test was negative for ischemia, and an echocardiogram showed normal ventricular function. Syncope is a sudden temporary loss of consciousness associated with a loss of postural tone and spontaneous recovery not requiring electrical or chemical cardioversion. Syncope has a large differential diagnosis, is difficult to evaluate, and can be disabling. There are subsets of syncopal patients with a high risk of sudden death. The central issues in the evaluation of syncope are establishing the cause of syncope, deciding whether the patient needs to be admitted, and treating the causes of syncope effectively to reduce recurrences and potentially improve patient outcomes. The first issue to resolve is whether the patient had syncope. Dizziness, presyncope, drop attacks, and vertigo are easily distinguished from syncope because these symptoms do not lead to loss of consciousness. Seizures, however, are often difficult to distinguish from syncope. Features useful in separating seizure and syncope are precipitants, prodromal symptoms, complaints during the spell, and symptoms after the episode. Loss of consciousness precipitated by pain or occurring after exercise, micturition, defecation, and stressful events is generally due to syncope, whereas aura may precede …