Abstract
Article history: Received on: 21/02/2013 Revised on: 09/03/2013 Accepted on: 25/03/2013 Available online: 27/04/2013 The purpose of the work is the comparative evaluation of GalenIQ 721, against known excipients such as Pharmatose M200 and Alfacel type 102. The evaluated parameters included compactibility curves, tablet ejection pressure, disintegration time and flowability of individual powders and mixtures of the excipients and amoxicillin. The surrogate and explicit compactibility of Alfacel 102 (492 N; 7.9 N) is superior, followed by GalenIQ 721 (310 N; 0.93 N) and Pharmatose M200 (203 N; -2.8 N). The lubricity of Alfacel 102 is superior (ejection pressure Pe=0.590 MPa), followed by GalenIQ 721 (Pe=6.45 MPa) and Pharmatose M200 (Pe=6.51 MPa). Disintegrability of tablets was better by GalenIQ (0.33 s/N), followed by Alfacel 102 (2.48 s/N) and Pharmatose M200 (4.47 s/N).GalenIQ 721 displays a powder fluidity of (14.4 g/s), followed by Alfacel 102 (7.88 g/s) and Pharmatose M200 (0.99 g/s). The tableting functionality of GalenIQ 721 is better than that of Pharmatose M200 but inferior of that of Alfacel 102. Although the GalenIQ 721 characteristics, predominantly brittle, are expected to be more stable to changes in formula composition and process conditions than those of Alfacel 102, plastic behavior.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.