Functional potential differences between Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in response to manure amendment in a reclaimed soil.

Abstract

Manure amendment generally bolsters soil organisms but not all bacteria equally. To understand why different taxa respond differently, we used shotgun metagenomic approaches to profile functional potentials and correlate them with taxon abundances. A soil originally unproductive was reclaimed using commercial manure and finally became productive. The abundance of Firmicutes in the soil decreased, whereas that of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased after manure addition. Thirty-nine KEGG modules were significantly different across fertilizer treatments. These modules were mainly associated with the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, and two-component signal transduction systems. The Proteobacteria and Firmicutes mainly contributed to these modules. Correlation between the abundances of phyla and orthologs showed two distinctive patterns. One linked the Firmicutes to cell wall biosynthesis, PTS, and ABC transporters, and the other linked the Betaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia to lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, bacterial motility, and carbon metabolism. Correlation between the abundances of phyla and Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme Database families also showed two distinctive patterns, one of them linking the Betaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia to very high abundances of glycosyltransferases and glycoside hydrolases. Overall, the Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were main drivers of functional potential differences across fertilizer treatments. The Firmicutes were enriched with genes associated with cell wall biosynthesis and membrane transports, while Proteobacteria with lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism, which supports our hypothesis that the Firmicutes have a lower potential for utilizing manure-derived carbohydrates, while Proteobacteria have a higher potential. This explains why the Proteobacteria and Firmicutes responded to manure differently.