Abstract
Monoclonal anti-cryptococcal TsF (which inhibits phagocytosis by macrophages) and antipicryl TsF use the same two circuits to block the transfer of contact sensitivity (CS). Both arm macrophages which then release a macrophage suppressor factor (MSF) when exposed to antigen. This MSF depresses the transfer of CS. The evidence suggests that a single molecular species of TsF (MW ca. 70 kDa), which bears an antigen-binding site and I-J determinant, is responsible for MSF production and inhibition of phagocytosis. Anti-cryptococcal TsF also arms the T acceptor cell which then releases nsTsF-1 after triggering with a specific antigen (SCPA). This nsTsF-1, which depresses the transfer of contact sensitivity, was authentic, as shown by its I-J positivity (in contrast to MSF) and its role in the production of nsTsF-2. As anti-picryl TsF also inhibits phagocytosis, it was concluded that anti-cryptococcal TsF, originally detected by the inhibition of phagocytosis, and anti-picryl TsF, originally detected by inhibition of CS, are functionally equivalent.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.