Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors are a standard of care for hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We investigated whether the selective oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant could improve progression-free survival compared with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients who had not received previous endocrine therapy. In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind trial, we recruited eligible patients with histologically confirmed oestrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive, or both, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer from 113 academic hospitals and community centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were endocrine therapy-naive, with WHO performance status 0-2, and at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection; on days 0, 14, 28, then every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole (1 mg orally daily) using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1·1, intervention by surgery or radiotherapy because of disease deterioration, or death from any cause, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment (including placebo). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01602380. Between Oct 17, 2012, and July 11, 2014, 524 patients were enrolled to this study. Of these, 462 patients were randomised (230 to receive fulvestrant and 232 to receive anastrozole). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the fulvestrant group than in the anastrozole group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·797, 95% CI 0·637-0·999, p=0·0486). Median progression-free survival was 16·6 months (95% CI 13·83-20·99) in the fulvestrant group versus 13·8 months (11·99-16·59) in the anastrozole group. The most common adverse events were arthralgia (38 [17%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group) and hot flushes (26 [11%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group). 16 (7%) of 228 patients in in the fulvestrant group and 11 (5%) of 232 patients in the anastrozole group discontinued because of adverse events. Fulvestrant has superior efficacy and is a preferred treatment option for patients with hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received previous endocrine therapy compared with a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, a standard of care for first-line treatment of these patients. AstraZeneca.

Highlights

  • The 500 mg dose of fulvestrant was approved based on data from the Phase 3, double-blind Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) study that compared fulvestrant 500 mg with fulvestrant 250 mg in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who experienced progression after prior endocrine therapy.[12]

  • The objective of the current study was to confirm the superior progression-free survival (PFS) advantage for fulvestrant versus anastrozole observed in the FIRST study, in a double-blind Phase 3 design

  • The Fulvestrant and AnastrozoLe COmpared in hormonal therapy Naïve advanced breast cancer (FALCON) trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01602380) is a Phase 3 randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, international, multicentre study that compared the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant with anastrozole in postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed ER+ and/or PgR+ locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 500 mg dose of fulvestrant was approved based on data from the Phase 3, double-blind Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) study that compared fulvestrant 500 mg with fulvestrant 250 mg in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who experienced progression after prior endocrine therapy.[12] In CONFIRM, progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] 0·80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·68–0·94; p=0·006)[12] and overall survival (OS; HR 0·81; 95% CI 0·69–0·96; p=0·02)[13] were increased with fulvestrant 500 mg vs fulvestrant 250 mg.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.