Abstract

ABSTRACT The data classification of fully polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) is one of the favourite topics in the remote sensing community. To date, a wide variety of algorithms have been utilized for PolSAR data classification, and among them kernel methods are the most attractive algorithms for this purpose. The most famous kernel method, i.e., the support vector machine (SVM) has been widely used for PolSAR data classification. However, until now, no studies to classify PolSAR data have been carried out using certain extended SVM versions, such as the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), relevance vector machine (RVM) and import vector machine (IVM). Therefore, this work has employed and compared these four kernel methods for the classification of three PolSAR data sets. These methods were compared in two groups: the SVM and LSSVM as non-probabilistic kernel methods vs. the RVM and IVM as probabilistic kernel methods. In general, the results demonstrated that the SVM was marginally better, more accurate and more stable than the probabilistic kernels. Furthermore, the LSSVM performed much faster than the probabilistic kernel methods and its associated version, the SVM, with comparable accuracy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.