Abstract
Background and Aims. In ancient grapevine varieties, the experimental design of field trials is crucial to providing a reliable evaluation of quantitative traits. The main purposes of this study are to demonstrate the benefits of the resolvable row-column design (RCD) for quantifying intravarietal variability and performing polyclonal selection and to compare the efficiency of fully and partially replicated designs for quantifying intravarietal variability to implement the latter designs for a preliminary analysis of that variability. Methods and Results. Linear mixed models were fitted to yield data obtained in field trials with fully and partially replicated designs. The results pointed out the importance of the RCD in controlling the spatial variability present in large field trials. Although less precise, a partially replicated design proved to be useful in evaluating intravarietal variability when the average of years was used. Conclusions. The results reinforced the importance of the RCD in increasing the efficiency of intravarietal variability quantification and polyclonal selection. The partially replicated design proved to be useful when the only objective was to perform a preliminary analysis of intravarietal variability. Significance of the Study. Understanding the role of experimental design in grapevine selection field trials will help grapevine breeders enhance their knowledge about variability within ancient varieties and implement more successful polyclonal selection.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.