Abstract
Geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments can be constructed quickly and at lower cost than traditional alternatives. However, the lack of deep foundation elements contributes to a perceived vulnerability to differential settlements at the foundation level, either because of scour undermining or compressible soils beneath the foundation. A full-scale abutment was constructed, instrumented, and subjected to carefully controlled differential settlements. Data collected during construction indicate that the abutment adequately supported the surcharge load. Subsequent large differential settlements imposed at the foundation level resulted in small surface expression of differential settlements, redistribution of stresses within the reinforced fill, and adequate support at the level of the superstructure. However, the facing units appeared vulnerable to removal, potentially exposing the reinforced fill to erosion. Three measures to help mitigate this risk are discussed: pinning the concrete masonry units (CMUs) near the corner of the abutment, adding a protective wrap behind the CMUs to encapsulate the fill, and increasing the reinforcement length at the base of the abutment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.