Abstract
In this paper we use partial order semantics to express the truly concurrent behaviour of Interval-Timed Petri nets (ITPNs) in their most general setting, i.e. with autoconcurrency and zero duration, as studied with its standard maximal step semantics in [1]. First we introduce the notion of timed processes for ITPNs inductively. Then we investigate if the equivalence of inductive and axiomatic process semantics - true for classical Petri nets - could hold for ITPNs too. We will see that the notions of independence and immediate firing obligation seem to be antagonistic ones, and that local axioms, adequate to define processes of classical Petri nets, are not sufficient to caracterize timed processes of ITPNs. We propose several original “global” axioms which reveal to be an effective solution. Thus we yield finally a full axiomatic definition of timed processes for ITPNs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
