Abstract

It is impossible to add a combinator to PCF to achieve full abstraction for models such as Berry’s stable domains in a way analogous to the addition of the “parallel-or” combinator that achieves full abstraction for the familiar complete partial order (cpo) model. In particular, we define a general notion of rewriting system of the kind used for evaluating simply typed $\lambda $-terms in Scott’s PCF. Any simply typed $\lambda $-calculus with such a “PCF-like” rewriting semantics is shown necessarily to satisfy Miler’s Context Lemma. A simple argument demonstrates that any denotational semantics that is adequate for PCF, and in which certain simple Boolean functionals exist, cannot be fully abstract for any extension of PCF satisfying the Context Lemma. An immediate corollary is that stable domains cannot be fully abstract for any extension of PCF definable by PCF-like rules.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.