Abstract

How do community gardens impact the psycho-social well-being of marginalized groups in urban settings? And to what extent are they examples of prefigurative social change, understood as the development of social relations that prefigure a more equal and empowering social world? We explore these issues through qualitative research with four community garden groups in East London, thematically analysing interviews and group discussions with 28 gardeners, Photovoice with 12 gardeners producing 250 photographs, and 40 hours of participant observation. We offer two unique insights: a novel understanding of how participation in community gardens affects well-being through creating ‘health-enabling social spaces’ (Campbell, C., & Cornish, F. (2010). Towards a “fourth generation” of approaches to HIV/AIDS management: Creating contexts for effective community mobilization. AIDS Care, 22(Suppl. 2), 1569-1579); and a discussion of how creating these spaces is an act of prefigurative social change. Our findings suggest that in East London, participation in community gardens is not based on a common political intention or self-conscious motive to prefigure a new society, but instead on the shared practice of gardening. This results in unintended benefits that often address participants’ personal adversities in ways that contribute to the material, relational and symbolic deprivation of their daily lives – opening up new possibilities for being, seeing and doing. In this sense, community gardens in East London offer an alternative to traditional notions of prefigurative social action that are predicated on strategic intention. We argue for an understanding of prefiguration that better accounts for what participants themselves would like to achieve in their own lives, rather than in relation to externally imposed notions of what counts as political change.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWe are interested in how the process of creating social spaces that improve well-being is a form of prefigurative social action in itself, despite being enacted by people without shared or explicit political intentions

  • How do community gardens impact the psycho-social well-being of marginalized groups in urban settings? And to what extent can they be considered examples of prefigurative social change, understood as the development of social relations that prefigure a more equal and empowering social world (Campbell, 2014)? Community gardens are increasingly seen as potential vehicles for improving social, environmental and health outcomes, but there is little formal research on how it affects the psycho-social well-being of gardeners and their communities

  • In response to Nettle’s (2014) call for a need to move beyond a static, ‘benefits analysis’ of community gardens, our aim is to demonstrate how the very creation of health-enabling social spaces in gardens is a form of smallscale prefigurative social action

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We are interested in how the process of creating social spaces that improve well-being is a form of prefigurative social action in itself, despite being enacted by people without shared or explicit political intentions We explore these issues through research from four community garden groups in East London. One of the United Kingdom’s most deprived and culturally diverse areas (East London NHS Foundation Trust, 2013), East London offers potential to investigate how community gardens are perceived and utilized by a wide variety of participants facing a range of social challenges This context provides a key framework for analysing how communities become constituted, affect well-being and enact social change. Glover suggests that this research helps frame “a community garden, which is a communal project, as an activity, and a neighbourhood as a context in which resistance occurs” (p. 207)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.