Abstract

Modernism criticism usaually pays more attention to performative texts and identities than to the public sphere that was a precondition of their production. Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge's theorization of the public sphere is used to contend that the modernist period witnessed not a decline but a transformation in public culture. It is argued that understanding turn-of-the-century literary production in terms of a transformation of the public sphere provides a better account of modernist masculinities than the criitical binaries that usually govern criticism of modernism's emergence. Three authors are discussed. The novels of George Fissing document London's changing public culture. Despite distaste for the new dissident indentities, Gissing's texts document emergent counterpublics in the 1880s and 1890s and the spaces in which they emerge. Dorothy Richardson's long anti-novel Pilgrimage goes further to represent specific material spaces like the new teashops as the stages on which a female masculinity could be performed. Finally, a reading of Kafka's short story 'The Judgement' is used to argue that despite his different location, the production of modernist masculinities in his work should also be understood in relation to the public sphere that was their material context.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.