Abstract
The article makes a counterpoint between the critical paradigm, action-oriented, hegemonic in the second half of the last century, and the paradigm of scientific purity and of current theoretical chastity, which requires a distancing between subject and object. The aim is to identify continuities and discontinuities of research in journalism and communication. The author does not make a choice either recommendations, but warns about the inevitably historical aspect of social theories, endorses E. Morin's anthropoethics, his holistic-humanitarian paradigm, and the proposal of Sousa Santos to understand science as a social practice of knowledge in constant dialogue with the world.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
