Abstract

AbstractData lifecycle models are used to visualize the stages data resources pass through from creation to completion of a research project and beyond. Although helpful, these models tend to depict idealized and impersonal circumstances that often involve curation actions taken by researchers themselves, while neglecting to represent dynamics particular to researchers' lives and careers. Meanwhile, research data are still infrequently managed successfully according to these models, which is a particular concern for “long tail” data, where sharing tends to depend on individual researchers' decisions and preservation actions. The paper addresses these considerations by exploring the ways in which long tail data lifecycles are entwined with human career lifecycles. Through interviews with astronomers, six affective dimensions that may impact data and career lifecycle dynamics are identified: painstakingness, loose ends, altruism, intellectual passion, legacy, and nostalgia. Building upon these insights and holistically drawing connections between human information behavior and data lifecycle modeling literature and frameworks, a researcher‐centered lifecycle model is proposed that seeks to depict the unique motivations and changing needs of researchers to share data throughout the courses of their careers. The paper concludes with suggestions for theoretical development and curatorial interventions in current data lifecycle modeling and data management practice.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.