From Joint Cognitive Systems to Human-AI Joint Cognitive Systems: A Theory Critique and Application to Obstetric Anesthesia Risk Assessment.

Use of Psychoactive Substances and Health Care in Response to Anxiety and Depressive Disorders

The Perception of Cancer Risk in Patients With Prevalent Barrett’s Esophagus Enrolled in an Endoscopic Surveillance Program

We have compared the use of primary health care and the diagnoses at visits to doctors in the Spili Health Centre (SHC) in Crete and the Dalby Health Centre (DHC) in Sweden. In DHC more patients per 1000 population visited the doctors than in SHC. This was so regardless of age-group and sex, in fact more or less regardless of diagnosis. Other differences between the populations were: The diagnosis acute otitis media was more frequent in the Dalby children than in the Spili ones. The opposite was true of "head injuries" which were more frequent in the Spili boys. Visits to doctors for bronchitis was more frequent in the Spili men, maybe because of the extensive smoking habits of Cretan men. Visits for diseases of the musculoskeletal system were more frequent in DHC than in SHC. A hypothesis worth testing is that this was influenced by differences in the health insurance and sick benefit systems. Angina pectoris was fairly frequent in both areas but cardiosclerosis (including healed myocardial infarction) was more common in DHC than in SHC. Use of primary health care may be influenced by the need for health care in the population, the accessibility of the health care facilities, the costs for the patients, the quality of care as perceived by the patients and by other sociocultural factors. Comparative studies, even though fairly uncommon today, may be of use in generating hypotheses about the impact of different factors on the use of health care.

Measuring Trends in Mental Health Care Disparities, 2000 2004

With the current patterns of adoption and use of robotic surgery and improvement in the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer, it is important to evaluate the immediate and long-term cost implications of treatments for patients with prostate cancer. To compare health care costs and use 1 year after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) vs robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This retrospective cohort study used a US commercial claims database from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. A total of 11 457 men aged 18 to 64 years who underwent inpatient radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and were continuously enrolled with medical and prescription drug coverage from 180 days before to 365 days after inpatient prostatectomy were identified. An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to examine the differences in costs and use of health care services by surgical modality. Data analysis was conducted from September 2019 to July 2020. Type of surgical procedure: ORP vs RARP. Three outcomes within 1 year after the inpatient prostatectomy were investigated: (1) total health care costs, including reimbursement paid by insurers and out of pocket by patients; (2) health care use, including inpatient readmission, emergency department, hospital outpatient, and office visits; and (3) estimated days missed from work due to health care use. Of the 11 457 patients who underwent inpatient prostatectomy, 1604 (14.0%) had ORP and 9853 (86.0%) had RARP and most patients (8467 [73.9%]) were aged 55 to 64 years. Compared with patients who underwent ORP, those who received RARP had a higher cost at the index hospitalization (mean difference, $2367; 95% CI, $1821-$2914; P < .001), but similar total cumulative costs were observed within 180 days (mean difference, $397; 95% CI, -$582 to $1375; P = .43) and 1 year after discharge (-$383; 95% CI, -$1802 to $1037; P = .60). One-year postdischarge health care use was significantly lower in the RARP compared with ORP group for mean numbers of emergency department visits (-0.09 visits; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.07 visits; P < .001) and hospital outpatient visits (-1.5 visits; -1.63 to -1.36 visits; P < .001). The reduction in use of health care services among patients who underwent RARP translated into additional savings of $2929 (95% CI, $1600-$4257; P < .001) and approximately 1.69 fewer days (95% CI, 1.49-1.89 days; P < .001) missed from work for health care visits. Total cumulative cost in this study was similar between ORP and RARP 1 year post discharge; this finding suggests that lower postdischarge health care use after RARP may offset the higher costs during the index hospitalization.

Background: Thailand has been facing a gradual increase in use of cross-border health care. Nevertheless, no evidence regarding factors influencing cross-border use of health care by Laotian patients in public Thai hospitals among this group has been established. Objectives: To assess the use of cross-border health care by Laotian patients, and factors that may influence health services in public Thai hospitals along the border. Methods: This study consisted of two parts. (1) Site-visits to 53 Thai public hospitals along the Thai-Laos border during May to July 2011 and collection of data regarding the use of health care services by Laotian patients. (2) A structured questionnaire survey was conducted via face interviews by trained researchers. Findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression. Results: The most common conditions for which treatment was sought were common diseases and basic operative procedures. All hospitals had been facing substantial financial burden, particularly for inpatient care. The analysis of use indicated that a perception of differences in the quality of health services, ability to pay for treatment anywhere, and distance to health services were three major factors affecting the decision of Laotian patients to cross the border to obtain health care in Thailand. Interviews with hospital directors and staff revealed that more financial support and a clear policy for care of Laotian patients was needed. Conclusions: The perception of better quality of health care in Thailand by Laotian patients was the major factor affecting cross-border use of health care services. Assistance to improve healthcare in Laos and financial support for subsidizing care for the indigent Laotian patients is needed.

Health insurance gaps are common among publicly insured children, undermining health care access and health. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act halted Medicaid disenrollments during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), offering an opportunity to study the impact of continuous Medicaid eligibility on child health insurance coverage, health care access and use, and health. Using 2016-2022 National Survey of Children's Health data (n = 182 910), we applied a difference-in-differences approach to compare changes in health insurance coverage gaps, health care access (unmet health care needs [any, mental health, and specialist]), health care use (preventive care, emergency department [ED]), and general health status before and during the PHE between publicly ("treated") and privately ("untreated") insured children. Adjusted models included child demographics, household characteristics, and state of residence. We also conducted subgroup analyses by child age and special health care need status. Continuous Medicaid eligibility was associated with a 3.1 percentage point (pp) decrease in health insurance coverage gaps (95% CI, -3.9 to -2.3) and a 3.9 pp decrease in ED use (95% CI, -5.7 to -2.0) among publicly insured children. Among children with special health care needs (CSHCN), continuous eligibility was associated with a larger decrease in ED use (-7.5 pp, 95% CI, -11.3 to -3.7) and was additionally associated with a 6.4 pp increase (95% CI, 2.7-10.1) in excellent general health status compared with children without special health care needs. No significant associations were observed with other indicators of health care access or use. Policies promoting continuous Medicaid eligibility may improve child health care use and health through improved coverage consistency, particularly among CSHCN.

We assessed racial/ethnic variations in patterns of ambulatory care use among Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care-eligible veterans to determine if racial/ethnic differences in health care use persist in equal-access systems. We surveyed 3227 male veterans about their health and ambulatory care use. Thirty-eight percent of respondents had not had a health care visit in the previous 12 months. Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.5), Hispanic (OR = 0.4), and Asian/Pacific Islander veterans (OR=0.4) were less likely than White veterans to report any ambulatory care use. Alternately, Whites (OR=2.2) were more likely than other groups to report ambulatory care use. Being White was a greater predictor of health care use than was having fair or poor health (OR=1.4) or functional limitations (OR=1.5). In non-VA settings, racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to have a usual provider of health care. There was no VA racial/ethnic variation in this parameter. Racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care use are present among VA health care-eligible veterans. Although the VA plays an important role in health care delivery to ethnic minority veterans, barriers to VA ambulatory care use and additional facilitators for reducing unmet need still need to be investigated.

More than 27% of individuals in the United States experience a disability. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to examine what is known about the impact of the 2010 Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on individuals with disabilities’ health care insurance coverage, health care access, and health care use. We followed the approach of Arskey and O’Malley in conducting our review. Electronic journal databases, hand searching of key health and disability journals, and reference checking were used to identify potential articles for the review. Individuals with disabilities or with conditions that could be disabling were included. The intervention used was the 2010 Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. Study eligibility criteria were peer-reviewed studies published in 2014 or later that conducted multivariate analyses of the effect of the Medicaid expansion on people with disabilities’ health insurance coverage, health care access, and health care use. The most consistent finding across studies was that the Medicaid expansion had a positive effect on health insurance coverage. It was generally found to have increased Medicaid coverage and decreased the uninsured rate. Its effect on private or employer-sponsored insurance coverage was a mix of no and negative effects. Findings related to health care access and use of care were more mixed. On a scale of 0 to 8 (highest quality), the quality of individual studies ranged from 2 to 6, with an average across studies of 4.2, the low end of adequate quality. Future studies should develop a more consistent approach to measuring disability and develop a core set of health care access and use measures to facilitate comparisons across studies so as to systematically evaluate the evidence related to the Medicaid expansion.

There is little knowledge on socioeconomic differences in use of health care organized by different care schemes and on exclusive and concurrent use of health care at different schemes in different socioeconomic groups. In Finland, public, occupational and private schemes offer parallel outpatient primary health care services. Each scheme mainly reaches different population groups because of differences in availability, costs and gatekeeping. This study aimed to analyse how the probability of using health care organized by the three schemes differed by socioeconomic status in a working-age population. Individual-level register-based data on use of public, occupational and private outpatient primary health care during 2013 as well as data on sociodemographic covariates were linked for the total population aged 25–64 of the city of Oulu, Finland. Data were analysed with descriptive methods and multinomial logistic regression models. Those in the study population most often used only occupational care or only public care, or did not use any of the studied health care schemes at all. The lower the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of not using care or using only public care. The higher the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of using occupational care–either only occupational care or occupational care in combination with private care. Education, occupational class and income were all associated with care use also when adjusted for sociodemographic covariates and chronic disease, but income proved to be the strongest predictor of the three. The results reflect the design of the Finnish health care system, with a strong occupational health care scheme for the employed population contributing to inequality in use of health care and potentially to health inequality between socioeconomic groups.

To identify and describe back pain trajectory groups and to compare indicators of health status, medication, and health care use in these groups. A representative sample (n = 12,782) of the Canadian population was followed-up from 1994/1995 to 2010/2011. Participants were interviewed biannually and provided data on sociodemographic (e.g., education) and behavior-related (e.g., physical activity) factors, depression, comorbidities, pain, disability, medication use (e.g., opioids), and health care use (e.g., primary care visits). We used group-based trajectory analysis to categorize participants according to patterns in the course of their back pain during the 16-year follow-up period and compared indicators of pain, disability, medication, and health care use in the trajectory groups. A total of 45.6% of the participants reported back pain at least once during follow-up. Of those, we identified 4 trajectories: persistent (18.0%), developing (28.1%), recovery (20.5%), and occasional (33.4%). The persistent and developing groups were characterized as having pain that prevented activities, disability, depression, and comorbidities. There were significant differences in the patterns of medication and health care use across the groups, with a general trend of most to least health care and medication use in the persistent, developing, recovering, and occasional groups. Those in the recovery group had an increasing trajectory reflecting opioid and antidepressant use. Approximately 1 in 5 people with back pain experience a persistent pain trajectory with an associated increase in pain, disability, and health care use. Further research is needed to determine whether the groups identified represent different diagnoses, which may provide insight into the selection of stratified treatment and aid in designing early prevention and management strategies in the population.

Beyond the needle: expanding the role of anesthesiologists in the management of chronic non-malignant pain.

Policy PointsUS policymakers considering proposals to expand public health care (such as “Medicare for all”) as a means of reducing inequalities in health care access and use could learn from the experiences of nations where well‐funded universal health care systems are already in place.In England, which has a publicly funded universal health care system, the use of core inpatient services by adults 65 years and older is equal across groups defined by education level, after controlling for health status. However, variation among these groups in the use of outpatient and emergency department care developed between 2010 and 2015, a period of relative financial austerity.Based on England's experience, introducing universal health care in the United States seems likely to reduce, but not entirely eliminate, inequalities in health care use across different population groups.ContextExpanding access to health care is once again high on the US political agenda, as is concern about those who are being “left behind.” But is universal health care that is largely free at the point of use sufficient to eliminate inequalities in health care use? To explore this question, we studied variation in the use of hospital care among education‐level‐defined groups of older adults in England, before and after controlling for differences in health status. In England, the National Health Service (NHS) provides health care free to all, but the growth rate for NHS funding has slowed markedly since 2010 during a widespread austerity program, potentially increasing inequalities in access and use.MethodsNovel linkage of data from six waves (2004‐2015) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) with participants’ hospital records (Hospital Episode Statistics [HES]) produced longitudinal data for 7,713 older adults (65 years and older) and 25,864 observations. We divided the sample into three groups by education level: low (no formal qualifications), mid (completed compulsory education), and high (at least some higher education). Four outcomes were examined: annual outpatient appointments, elective inpatient admissions, emergency inpatient admissions, and emergency department (ED) visits. We estimated regressions for the periods 2004‐2005 to 2008‐2009 and 2010‐2011 to 2014‐2015 to examine whether potential education‐related inequalities in hospital use increased after the growth rate for NHS funding slowed in 2010.FindingsFor the study period, our sample of ELSA respondents in the low‐education group made 2.44 annual outpatient visits. In comparison, after controlling for health status, we found that participants in the high‐education group made an additional 0.29 outpatient visits annually (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11‐0.47). Additional outpatient health care use in the high‐education group was driven by follow‐up and routine appointments. This inequality widened after 2010. Between 2010 and 2015, individuals in the high‐education group made 0.48 (95% CI, 0.21‐0.74) more annual outpatient visits than those in the low‐education (16.9% [7.5% to 26.2%] of annual average 2.82 visits). In contrast, after 2010, the high‐education group made 0.04 (95% CI, −0.075 to 0.001) fewer annual ED visits than the low‐education group, which had a mean of 0.30 annual ED visits. No significant differences by education level were found for elective or emergency inpatient admissions in either period.ConclusionsAfter controlling for demographics and health status, there was no evidence of inequality in elective and emergency inpatient admissions among the education groups in our sample. However, a period of financial budget tightening for the NHS after 2010 was associated with the emergence of education gradients in other forms of hospital care, with respondents in the high‐education group using more outpatient care and less ED care than peers in the low‐education group. These estimates point to rising inequalities in the use of hospital care that, if not reversed, could exacerbate existing health inequalities in England. Although the US and UK settings differ in many ways, our results also suggest that a universal health care system would likely reduce inequality in US health care use.

The Perception of Cancer Risk in Patients With Prevalent Barrett’s Esophagus Enrolled in an Endoscopic Surveillance Program

Background: Sociocultural factors have been linked to health care seeking among Latino adults. A supportive social context may encourage proactive steps leading to health maintenance, including healthcare seeking. Objective: To explore the cross-sectional association of marital status with annual health care provider visits among Hispanic/Latino adults ages 18-74 with and without chronic diseases. Methods: Participants from HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study with measures of social support, marital status, and health care use were included in the analysis (n=3,401). Marital status was self-reported. Health care use was defined as whether the participant saw a health care provider in the past twelve months. Weighted multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of marital status with healthcare use, after adjusting for covariates. Results: On average, participants were 40 years old , 83% were currently married, and 73% had at least one health care provider visit in the past twelve months. Analyses were stratified by gender and the findings were null in men, therefore only the findings in women are reported. Among Hispanic/ Latino women with chronic diseases, individuals who were married were more likely to have an annual health care provider visit than those who had never married. However, this association no longer remained significant after adjustment. Among Latino women without chronic diseases, individuals who were married were less likely to have an annual health care provider visit than those who were never married. Conclusion: Marital status is associated with health care use among Hispanic/Latino women without chronic diseases. Future research should assess whether marianismo, a culture specific gender role characterized by self-sacrifice and prioritization of familial needs, influences marital status’ association with preventive health care utilization among Latino women.