‘Frightening Yet Fulfilling’: Vulnerability, Precarity and the Labour of Harm Reduction

Access to appropriate oral healthcare is vital for overall health and well-being. However, people who use drugs (PWUD) often face significant barriers in accessing oral healthcare services. This qualitative study focused on exploring the perspectives of public oral health service providers and harm reduction workers to understand the barriers that they perceived were experienced by PWUD in accessing oral healthcare and identified potential strategies to address these barriers. Thirty-five participants (20 public oral health service providers and 15 harm reduction workers) were recruited from both metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria, Australia, through purposive sampling and a snowballing technique. Individual online semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analysed using a hybrid approach to thematic analysis. Service providers felt that continuous drug use impacted PWUD's ability to perceive dental pain, which delayed identification of oral health symptoms at the individual level. Major life crises meant that PWUD had limited awareness about the oral health consequences of their drug use, which further hindered their access to care. Service providers described how negative experiences and perceived judgements by PWUD about the visual effects of drugs created barriers to accessing dental care. Triggers of memories of traumatic abuse associated with the dental environments were also identified as a distressing factor for PWUD. Perceived service-level barriers included the lack of explicit recognition of PWUD as eligible for priority access in public dental clinics, financial impediments and coercive tactics from some oral health service providers. Service providers with experience of working in rural areas shared how the lack of anonymity and the risk of being identified as a drug user was an additional challenge for PWUD in accessing oral health services in rural areas. The participants proposed several potential strategies including drop-in oral health sessions at harm reduction facilities involving case managers to address appointment issues and training oral health service providers in trauma-informed care. They emphasised the need for interprofessional collaboration between oral health and harm reduction sectors. One key recommendation proposed by the participants was to establish oral health integrated harm reduction programmes that require careful consideration of feasibility, acceptability, resource allocation and potential implications on service quality. This study highlighted previously unrecognised perceived barriers by service providers working with PWUD that could impact the implementation of any interventions that aim to improve access to dental services by PWUD. By addressing the individual and service level barriers comprehensively, healthcare systems can better address the oral health needs of PWUD and reduce disparities in access to care.

From drug prohibition to regulation: a public health imperative

COVID-19 vulnerability among people who use drugs: recommendations for global public health programmes and policies.

Harm reduction is a grassroots, practical set of strategies to mitigate the negative consequences of drug use, and it is a movement that acknowledges that people may not stop using drugs. Clinician stigma remains a barrier to implementation of harm reduction practices, which further disempowers and jeopardizes the health of people who use drugs (PWUD). Our study objective was to understand the impact of interprofessional harm reduction trainings on health professions students' and clinicians' knowledge and stigma toward PWUD. Harm reduction outreach specialists, faculty physicians, and individuals with lived experience delivered 3 virtual, interactive trainings. We conducted pre-/post-surveys of knowledge and stigma. Stigma was evaluated using a validated instrument, the Medical Condition Regard Scale. Using SPSS Version 29, pre- and post-survey responses were compared using McNemar's test for paired knowledge/attitude categories, paired t-test for stigma scores. Our institutional IRB reviewed this study as exempt research. Of 313 participants, the majority were medical (n = 116, 37%), dental (n = 66, 22%), pharmacy (n = 17, 5%), or nursing (n = 16, 5%) students. Ninety-four participants submitted pre- and post-training surveys; 87 fully completed both surveys. Although baseline knowledge of harm reduction was high, knowledge/attitudes showed a trend toward improvement. Comfort in applying harm reduction was enhanced from pre- to post-training (68%-95%, P < .001), and respondents increasingly applied harm reduction strategies, from 62% pre-training to 86% post-training (P < .001). Participant stigma scores improved from 50 + 8 pre-training, and 53 + 8 post-training (P < .001). Harm reduction curricula developed and administered by interprofessional teachers, including those with lived experience, may reduce stigma toward PWUD, increase clinician comfort, and support consistent application of harm reduction practices in those with prior elevated baseline knowledge. Our work highlights the importance of including harm reduction training in interprofessional education.

Harm reduction is a public health approach that emphasizes reducing the negative effects of drug use rather than eliminating it. It has been practiced for decades; however, the COVID-19 pandemic poses new challenges for people who use drugs (PWUD) and harm reduction providers. In the United States, public health recommendations to curb the pandemic are complicating harm reduction efforts. Harm reduction programs are rethinking how they engage with PWUD to comply with these recommendations while also providing essential services. In this article, we draw on academic literature, news articles, and information distributed by harm reduction programs to discuss issues currently faced by PWUD and harm reduction providers across the country. This discussion focuses on policy changes and programming adaptations related to three harm reduction interventions—syringe services programs, overdose prevention, and medications for opioid use disorder—that have emerged or gained traction during the pandemic. We argue that anthropologists should play a key role in addressing the obstacles and opportunities for harm reduction in the United States during and post-pandemic. Ethnographic research can generate important knowledge of how pandemic-related service and policy changes are localized by providers and experienced by PWUD and uncover how race, class, and gender may shape access to and experiences with modified harm reduction services. Applied anthropologists also have an important role in collaborating with harm reduction programs to ensure that the voices of marginalized individuals are not ignored as policy and programming changes take place during and after the pandemic.

BackgroundPopular perception of people who sell drugs is negative, with drug selling framed as predatory and morally reprehensible. In contrast, people who use drugs (PWUD) often describe positive perceptions of the people who sell them drugs. The “Satellite Sites” program in Toronto, Canada, provides harm reduction services in the community spaces where people gather to buy, use, and sell drugs. This program hires PWUD—who may move into and out of drug selling—as harm reduction workers. In this paper, we examine the integration of people who sell drugs directly into harm reduction service provision, and their practices of care with other PWUD in their community.MethodsData collection included participant observation within the Satellite Sites over a 7-month period in 2016–2017, complemented by 20 semi-structured interviews with Satellite Site workers, clients, and program supervisors. Thematic analysis was used to examine practices of care emerging from the activities of Satellite Site workers, including those circulating around drug selling and sharing behaviors.ResultsSatellite Site workers engage in a variety of practices of care with PWUD accessing their sites. Distribution of harm reduction equipment is more easily visible as a practice of care because it conforms to normative framings of care. Criminalization, coupled with negative framings of drug selling as predatory, contributes to the difficultly in examining acts of mutual aid and care that surround drug selling as practices of care. By taking seriously the importance for PWUD of procuring good quality drugs, a wider variety of practices of care are made visible. These additional practices of care include assistance in buying drugs, information on drug potency, and refusal to sell drugs that are perceived to be too strong.ConclusionOur results suggest a potential for harm reduction programs to incorporate some people who sell drugs into programming. Taking practices of care seriously may remove some barriers to integration of people who sell drugs into harm reduction programming, and assist in the development of more pertinent interventions that understand the key role of drug buying and selling within the lives of PWUD.

BackgroundHarm reduction services to people who use drugs (PWUD) in Russia are insufficient in terms of quantity, government endorsement, and accessibility. The situation has recently deteriorated even further because of social distancing measures of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recently several harm reduction organizations have started to provide some harm reduction services via online platforms by web outreach. However, little is known on how online outreach services are organized and implemented. Drawing on the example of St. Petersburg-based NGO “Humanitarian Action” we explored web outreach work in Telegram instant messenger.Methods4 semi-structured interviews with the NGO staff and 301 cases of web outreach work with PWUD comprised the dataset. The process of web outreach, service provision to PWUD, and PWUD’s needs were thematically analyzed.ResultsThree stages of the process of web outreach work were determined: clients initiating communication, NGO workers addressing clients’ needs, and NGO workers receiving clients’ feedback. Communication proceeded either in group chat or in direct messages. Challenges in addressing clients’ needs happened when clients turned for help in nighttime, sent recorded voice messages, sent unclear messages, and/or were unwilling to transition to telephone communication. All web outreach workers reported receiving only positive feedback on their work. PWUD’s needs were categorized into two major themes, depending on whether they can be addressed fully or partially online. In cases of online only provision of services, web outreach workers helped PWUD treat minor injection drug use complications, obtain verified harm reduction information and receive general psychological support. In instances of partial online services provision, PWUD were assisted in getting treatment of severe injection drug use complications, overdoses, and in accessing offline medical, psychological, social, legal and harm reduction services.ConclusionsOur research demonstrated that web outreach work is a convenient tool for delivering some harm reduction services to PWUD either partially or completely online and recruiting new clients (including hard-to-reach PWUD that avoid attending brick-and-mortar facilities). It indicates that harm reduction organizations should consider incorporating online harm reduction services into their activities. However, more research is needed to explore relative advantages and disadvantages of online harm reduction services delivery.

BackgroundResearch collaborations between people who use drugs (PWUD) and researchers are largely underutilized, despite the long history of successful, community-led harm reduction interventions and growing health disparities experienced by PWUD. PWUD play a critical role in identifying emerging issues in the drug market, as well as associated health behaviors and outcomes. As such, PWUD are well positioned to meaningfully participate in all aspects of the research process, including population of research questions, conceptualization of study design, and contextualization of findings.Main bodyWe argue PWUD embody unparalleled and current insight to drug use behaviors, including understanding of novel synthetic drug bodies and the dynamics at play in the drug market; they also hold intimate and trusting relationships with other PWUD. This perfectly situates PWUD to collaborate with researchers in investigation of drug use behaviors and development of harm reduction interventions. While PWUD have a history of mistrust with the medical community, community-led harm reduction organizations have earned their trust and are uniquely poised to facilitate research projects. We offer the North Carolina Survivors Union as one such example, having successfully conducted a number of projects with reputable research institutions. We also detail the fallacy of meaningful engagement posed by traditional mechanisms of capturing community voice. As a counter, we detail the framework developed and implemented by the union in hopes it may serve as guidance for other community-led organizations. We also situate research as a mechanism to diversify the job opportunities available to PWUD and offer a real-time example of the integration of these principles into public policy and direct service provision.ConclusionIn order to effectively mitigate the risks posed by the fluid and volatile drug market, research collaborations must empower PWUD to play meaningful roles in the entirety of the research process. Historically, the most effective harm reduction interventions have been born of the innovation and heart possessed by PWUD; during the current overdose crisis, there is no reason to believe they will not continue to be.

Argentina’s national drug law, Law 23.737, has been in effect since 1989. Based on prohibitionist drug policy, this law was intended to severely punish drug traffickers and protect the public from drug use-related health concerns. However, it has failed to achieve these goals, and instead targets people who use drugs (PWUD) and brands them “criminals.” In response, the Argentine government announced its intent to reform Law 23.737 in 2008, sparking widespread debate among health, legal, and social service professionals. This article discusses this debate from the perspective of harm reductionists, those who work to reduce the negative effects of drug use rather than eliminate drug use or ensure abstinence. Drawing on archival research and 16 months of ethnographic fieldwork in Argentina, this article examines the positionality of harm reductionists in this drug policy reform, particularly the controversial proposal to decriminalize drug possession for personal use. Demonstrating their contention that Argentina’s legal apparatus is a major contributor to PWUD’s discrimination, stigmatization, and isolation from health and social services, I argue that challenging these problems through policy engagement allows Argentine harm reductionists to draw attention to the broader question of PWUD’s rights and to ultimately recast PWUD as rights-bearing citizens.

BackgroundHarm reduction services to people who use drugs (PWUD) in Russia are insufficient in terms of quantity, government endorsement, and accessibility. The situation has recently deteriorated even further because of social distancing measures of the COVID-19 pandemic. Several organizations have started to provide some harm reduction services via online platforms by web outreach. However, little is known on how online outreach services are organized and implemented. Drawing on the example of St. Petersburg-based NGO “Humanitarian Action,” we explored web outreach work in Telegram instant messenger.MethodsOur data were comprised of 4 semi-structured interviews with the NGO staff and 301 cases of web outreach work with PWUD. We used thematic analysis to study the process of web outreach, harm reduction service provision, and needs of PWUD.ResultsThree stages of the process of web outreach work were identified: clients initiating communication, NGO workers addressing clients’ needs, and NGO workers receiving clients’ feedback. Communication proceeded in group chat or direct messages. Challenges in addressing clients’ needs happened when clients turned for help after hours, sent recorded voice messages, sent unclear messages, and/or were unwilling to transition to telephone communication. All web outreach workers reported receiving only positive feedback on their work. The needs of PWUD were categorized into two major themes, depending on whether they can be addressed fully or partially online. In cases of online only provision of services, web outreach workers helped PWUD treat minor injection drug use complications, obtain verified harm reduction information and receive general psychological support. In instances of partial online services provision, PWUD were assisted in getting treatment of severe injection drug use complications, overdoses, and in accessing offline medical, psychological, social, legal and harm reduction services.ConclusionsOur research demonstrated that web outreach work is a convenient tool for delivering some harm reduction services to PWUD either partially or completely online and for recruiting new clients (including hard-to-reach PWUD that avoid attending brick-and-mortar facilities). Harm reduction organizations should consider incorporating online harm reduction services into their activities. However, further research is needed to explore relative advantages and disadvantages of online harm reduction services.

Research suggests that food insecurity exacerbates the harms experienced by people who use drugs (PWUD). Therefore, improving the food security status can help PWUD reduce drug-related harms. This paper identifies a knowledge gap in public health and harm reduction literatures regarding the relationship between food and harm reduction. We argue that there needs to be a more comprehensive and systematic model of food provision in harm reduction services. Our argument is based on a qualitative case study of 42 people who currently use, or have used drugs in Vancouver, Canada and of staff of 27 programs that provide harm reduction services in the city. The research demonstrates how PWUD experience the effects of drug use on their food consumption, how they access food, and how they practice self-care. It also shows how harm reduction services, while they often provide food, are unable to systematically address the dietary-related harms associated with drug use. This presents an opportunity and a challenge for these organizations and for harm reduction as a public health approach. We call for more research to be done on food as harm reduction and for stable publically funded food provision in harm reduction-oriented services.

People who use drugs (PWUD) frequently seek care in the emergency department (ED). Little is known about ED physician perspectives and experiences integrating a harm reduction approach into care, including interventions that reduce the health, social and legal consequences of drug use without requiring a reduction in drug use. This study aimed to describe the experiences of Canadian emergency physicians caring for PWUD, and facilitators and barriers to implementing harm reduction interventions in the ED. Purposive sampling, using an existing national network, and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit practicing emergency physicians. Semi-structured, one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted until theoretical data saturation was achieved. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using latent content analysis. Interviews took place between June 2019 and February 2020. This work is a secondary analysis specifically focused on harm reduction approaches to care. 32 physician interviews were included. Participants had a median of 10 years of experience (range 1-33) and most (29/32) worked in urban EDs. Participants highlighted the complexities of caring for PWUD, including the intersection of structural vulnerability with substance use. The ED environment varied across Canada and either facilitated or hindered the adoption of harm reduction interventions. Additional barriers included a lack of training and experience; lack of community follow-up care; insufficient ED funding and staffing resources; and, tensions over the appropriate scope of emergency medicine practice. Facilitators included tailored education and training; specialized multidisciplinary teams; ED harm reduction champions; and standardized protocols. Though variability existed in the adoption and practice of harm reduction in Canadian EDs, most interviewed physicians supported a harm reduction approach to care. To facilitate widespread ED adoption of harm reduction interventions, there is a need for standardized guidance, supplemental resources, facilitated culture change, and sufficient community-based services.

BackgroundDespite multiple harm reduction (HR) programmes worldwide, there are still an important number of people who use drugs (PWUD) who do not access those services. Their difficulties to obtain HR tools are due to their inability to reach such services (remoteness and/or limited customer service hours), costs, quantitative restrictions, fear of judgement, lack of confidentiality in pharmacy, and unfamiliarity with HR programmes. We tested an innovative approach using the power of remote online communication and the national postal distribution network to improve HR tool access and counselling.MethodsBased on these observations, SAFE association created HaRePo in 2011, a free and confidential programme designed for people who have difficulties accessing HR tools and counselling. PWUD can access the programme by phone and/or email. An HR professional delivers HR counselling and HR tools and connects PWUD to other HR services, medical, and social workers. HR tools are prepared and sent according to the person’s needs through the French postal service to consumers across Metropolitan France and overseas territories.ResultsSince 2011, 1920 PWUD have benefited from HaRePo: 10,450 parcels were sent accounting for more than 1.7 million syringes and 6 million HR-related items. HaRePo receives positive feedback from PWUD who have improved their practices through remote but trusted communication. The percentage of people that, after joining the programme, never reuse and/or share HR tools have significantly increased. On average, 71.5% of beneficiaries never reuse syringes and 81% do not reuse needles. And they are 98.5% consumers who never share syringes and 99% needles any longer. Between 44 and 80% HaRePo beneficiaries have reported that their drug-related practices (injection, inhalation, and snorting) are now safer. Finally, between 39 and 53% HaRePo consumers declared that their overall physical state has improved (e.g. venous condition, the appearance of point of injection, swelling of arms, legs, and hands).ConclusionHaRePo is an innovative HR programme efficient for hard-to-reach PWUD. It shows evidence of a positive feedback loop for PWUD in improving their practices. Finally, HaRePo represents a clear benefit for health authorities in France, who decided to expand the programme in 2016.

BackgroundHarm reduction services and professionals have had to reorganise and adapt to COVID-19 prevention measures while still ensuring health and social services for people who use drugs (PUD).ObjectiveTo assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PUD and on the professionals who provide harm reduction services.MethodsA qualitative, exploratory, multicentre design was used. Two focus groups were held with harm reduction professionals, and 40 individual semi-structured interviews were undertaken with PUD in various harm reduction services in Catalonia. Interviews and focus group discussions were transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis.ResultsHarm reduction services adapted to the pandemic situation by employing methods such as reducing opening hours and closing drop in areas, along with health protection measures such as access control, which in turn led to stress among both professionals and service users. Despite the changes implemented, PUD continued to have access to sterile drug use equipment and methadone treatment. In addition, those who were not in treatment were able to access it rapidly. Regarding their emotional state, the PUD reported that it was worse during the pandemic than before the lockdown, with women affected to a greater extent than men. The harm reduction professionals reported difficulties in managing service users’ compliance with the security measures at the beginning of the lockdown and having had to focus primarily on providing food and shelter for the PUD.ConclusionsIt is important to keep PUD in mind and maintain a harm reduction perspective when implementing confinement measures in situations such as those experienced during the COVID pandemic. Guaranteeing that PUD have their basic needs such as food, hygiene and shelter covered is key.

‘It's too much, I'm getting really tired of it’: Overdose response and structural vulnerabilities among harm reduction workers in community settings