Abstract

Fracture assessment of axial crack in steel pipe subjected to internal pressure is reviewed. Assessment results were obtained using different methods FC, GS and FAD in order to compare between their results and facilitate their use in any maintenance program. Material type and crack geometry are considered as the main two parameters controlling the failure of the pipe. The constitutive equation of the material is represented by the Ramberg – Osgood model. Six different half crack lengths (40, 60, 80, 100, 120,and 140mm) and four values of the ratio between the crack depth and the pipe thickness are considered (0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8). The relationship between the fracture parameters (i.e., stress intensity factor K and the J-integral) and the crack length for each assessment method is used. The material properties, plane strain fracture toughness KIc as well as the critical value of J-integral Jcr, are used to determine the critical crack size under specified internal pressure. The assessment method that gives smaller critical crack size is the one which is more conservative than the others. The results obtained by using GS and FAD assessment methods show this type of conservation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.